john thomas vs kam commercial service 2 others 2023 tzhclandd 16938 26 september 2023
The application is incompetent because the matter did not originate from the Ward Tribunal but from the District Land and Housing Tribunal; section 47(3) does not apply.
- Citation
- john thomas vs kam commercial service 2 others 2023 tzhclandd 16938 26 september 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: John Thomas; 1st Respondent: KAM Commercial Service; 2nd Respondent: Nasoro Athman Zonzo; 3rd Respondent: Registered Trustees of Ashura Foundation
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Certificate on Point of Law, Jurisdiction, Execution of Decree, Registry Defects
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Thomas
Applicant
KAM Commercial Service
1st Respondent
Nasoro Athman Zonzo
2nd Respondent
Registered Trustees of Ashura Foundation
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for certificate on point of law is competent under section 47(3) of the Land Disputes Court Act
- 2 Whether the matter originated from the Ward Tribunal or District Land and Housing Tribunal
- 3 Whether filing in the wrong registry constitutes an incurable defect
Ratio Decidendi
The application is incompetent because the matter did not originate from the Ward Tribunal but from the District Land and Housing Tribunal; section 47(3) does not apply.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- Preliminary objection sustained
- Application struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment