jonathan chacha tyenyi vs said seif dibwe 2023 tzhc 23108 15 june 2023

The registered deed of settlement complies with legal requirements and is adopted as a consent order, marking the application and related cases as withdrawn and settled.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: jonathan chacha tyenyi vs said seif dibwe 2023 tzhc 23108 15 june 2023
Parties: Applicant: Jonathan Chacha Tyenyi; Respondent: Said Seif Dibwe
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 15 June 2023
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Consent Judgment
Outcome: application withdrawn and settled by consent
Legal Topics: Deed of Settlement, Withdrawal of Application, Payment of Debt, Consent Order
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Deed of Settlement Withdrawal of Application Payment of Debt Consent Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Jonathan Chacha Tyenyi

Applicant

Said Seif Dibwe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Consent Judgment

Legal Issues

1 whether the deed of settlement complies with Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code
2 whether the application should be withdrawn and the debt settled by transfer of property

Ratio Decidendi

The registered deed of settlement complies with legal requirements and is adopted as a consent order, marking the application and related cases as withdrawn and settled.

Court Disposition

application withdrawn and settled by consent

Orders

Application No. 08/2022 marked withdrawn
Applicant offers Plot No. 233 Block H at Kiumanihewa, Nachingwea District to respondent as payment of debt

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.