jonathan charles makima vs st benedict health centre 2023 tzhc 1266 5 may 2023

jonathan charles makima vs st benedict health centre 2023 tzhc 1266 5 may 2023

The applicant failed to account for each day of the 164-day delay and did not provide sufficient reasons as required by law; pursuing complaints through political or administrative channels does not justify the delay.

Citation
jonathan charles makima vs st benedict health centre 2023 tzhc 1266 5 may 2023
Parties
Applicant: Jonathan Charles Makima; Respondent: St. Benedict Health Centre
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Misc. Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitral Award, Unfair Termination, Delay and Sufficient Cause
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision of Arbitral Award Unfair Termination Delay and Sufficient Cause

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan Charles Makima

Applicant

St. Benedict Health Centre

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient reasons to warrant extension of time to file revision against the CMA decision

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for each day of the 164-day delay and did not provide sufficient reasons as required by law; pursuing complaints through political or administrative channels does not justify the delay.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed for lack of merit.