mayenje edited scanned

mayenje edited scanned

The application for temporary injunction was granted because the respondent did not object to the application, and the court found it necessary to maintain the status quo pending the main suit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
mayenje edited scanned
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Chiley Mayenje; Applicant: Sabrina Paul Kyara; Applicant: Silvester Adam Kyando; Respondent: Abrahamu Godwin Msyete
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
Application for temporary injunction granted
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunction, Status Quo, Interlocutory Relief
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Land Law Temporary Injunction Status Quo Interlocutory Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Chiley Mayenje

Applicant

Sabrina Paul Kyara

Applicant

Silvester Adam Kyando

Applicant

Abrahamu Godwin Msyete

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a temporary injunction should be granted to restrain the respondent from continuing construction on the disputed land pending determination of the main suit

Ratio Decidendi

The application for temporary injunction was granted because the respondent did not object to the application, and the court found it necessary to maintain the status quo pending the main suit.

Court Disposition

Application for temporary injunction granted

Orders

  • Temporary injunction issued restraining the respondent and associates from continuing construction on the disputed land pending determination of Land Case No. 3188 of 2025
  • No order as to costs at this stage