JOSEPH UTUMISHI final
The application was filed more than six months after the final decision of 21st September 2022, rendering it time-barred under Rule 6. The court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application.
- Citation
- JOSEPH UTUMISHI final
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph I. Tlehema; 1st Respondent: Chief Executive Officer, National Construction Council (NCC); 2nd Respondent: Chief Secretary, President’s Office; 3rd Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for being time-barred.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Certiorari, Mandamus, Salary Arrears, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph I. Tlehema
Applicant
Chief Executive Officer, National Construction Council (NCC)
1st Respondent
Chief Secretary, President’s Office
2nd Respondent
Attorney General
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to apply for certiorari and mandamus is time-barred under Rule 6 of the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review Procedure and Fees) Rules 2014
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed more than six months after the final decision of 21st September 2022, rendering it time-barred under Rule 6. The court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for being time-barred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment