joseph lugata vs republic 2020 tzca 340 23 april 2020

joseph lugata vs republic 2020 tzca 340 23 april 2020

The delay in filing the application for review was technical, resulting from the initial timely but incompetent application being struck out. The applicant was not negligent, as the delay was beyond his control due to reliance on prison authorities. Sufficient cause was shown for extension of time.

Citation
joseph lugata vs republic 2020 tzca 340 23 april 2020
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Lugata; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
23 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Application for Review
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Technical Delay
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Lugata

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Application for Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for review

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in filing the application for review was technical, resulting from the initial timely but incompetent application being struck out. The applicant was not negligent, as the delay was beyond his control due to reliance on prison authorities. Sufficient cause was shown for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Time enlarged for the applicant to lodge his application for review within thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling.