joseph mukwano another vs republic 2014 tzhc 2234 28 february 2014

The applications were filed outside the 60-day limitation period prescribed by Rule 66(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, rendering them incompetent and liable to be struck out.

Citation: joseph mukwano another vs republic 2014 tzhc 2234 28 february 2014
Parties: Applicant: Joseph Mukwano; Applicant: Deogratias Nicholaus @ Jesh; Respondent: The Republic
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 28 February 2014
Procedural Posture: Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: applications struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics: Review, Limitation Period, Incompetent Application
Source Language: English

Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Review Limitation Period Incompetent Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Joseph Mukwano

Applicant

Deogratias Nicholaus @ Jesh

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applications for review were filed within the prescribed time limit under Rule 66(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
2 Whether the applications are competent

Ratio Decidendi

The applications were filed outside the 60-day limitation period prescribed by Rule 66(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, rendering them incompetent and liable to be struck out.

Court Disposition

applications struck out as incompetent

Orders

Applications struck out as incompetent.
Applicants may seek extension of time to file review.