Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19890307 TZHC Tanga

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The trial magistrate erred by failing to treat the evidence of the co-accused Gibson Namlatonda with the necessary caution and by not seeking corroboration. The prosecution did not prove the appellants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the possibility that someone else stole the windscreen while the appellants were on duty cannot be excluded.

Court disposition

conviction and sentence quashed

Orders

  • Appellants acquitted
  • Compensation order set aside

02

Material facts

Parties

Joseph Petro

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Alqaro

Muosa Heriedi

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Alqaro

The Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Compensation Ordered: TZS 60,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellants argued there was insufficient evidence to prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the trial magistrate erred in relying on the testimony of a co-accused without proper corroboration.
Respondent
Prosecution argued that the evidence, particularly from Gibson Namlatonda, established the appellants' guilt and that the windscreen was handed over to them during their shift.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Evidence Act, Section 2(a), Act No. 6 of 1967

    The burden of proof in criminal cases rests on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

  2. 02

    Rv Kenneth F. Preacher (1960) 44 CRR 83; Kulo s/o Kilimime v R (1972) HC, No.157; Paulo Mrimi v R (1977) HC, No.34

    Evidence of an accomplice must be treated with caution and requires corroboration before conviction can be based on it.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The trial magistrate erred by failing to treat the evidence of the co-accused Gibson Namlatonda with the necessary caution and by not seeking corroboration. The prosecution did not prove the appellants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the possibility that someone else stole the windscreen while the appellants were on duty cannot be excluded.

Obiter and limits

  • An accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The burden of proof never shifts to the accused in criminal trials.

Court disposition

conviction and sentence quashed

  • Appellants acquitted
  • Compensation order set aside

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 7 March 1989

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 7 March 1989

19890307 TZHC Tanga

:OT T:i:J: lffiCfa: COURT 01:' TAHZJJJIA --- AT T.AlTGA APPELL.LT~:; JiJRLDICJ 1JICJ1T HIGH COURT CRii'-1LT.AL i'2P.1;"l.1 lJO. 14 · of 198G ORIGDJAL CBil:ITITLL Cli.:~E ?TOo 359 OF 1987 OF TffiJ DI.JTRIGT COlJ:1 ~: OF 'I'L.EGi:\. DIGTRICT LT TAJ:TGA 1st JO;.:;Em Fl!.'TRO · . , ..,. _ , •• • • ; •• , • • • , • • , •• • , •• • .AP:emLL.._c_.dT 2nd. MO'S"JA r@IEDI ' ( ORIGn:u...t ACCU.;im>) Versus T:LJ REPiJBLIC, , fi • • • • , • J, •• , • • • • • • • • .RE:3PON.OE1ll' ( ORIGDTAL P.ROSIXJO'l'OR) J'UDGEMDH~ Jos8:til Petro,.. 1st ap~llr.ilt aJ.10.: Muosa Heriedi- ".9 2nd a.p,pella.nt wo~ joi11tl;: cb.ars-ed ,;-rith om G4.'1sqn rfo.i:1a.tond.a. who ua,1 aaqui tt9d, 0 · for t:1e offence of stc.:1linG by serrrn1t. d/s 271 nN1 265 of the Pena.l ooo.e. They were convic·te d and santerwod -J;o five Y8a.t'S ~ risonrae11t eo.ch, Thay wc:ro fl.U'thor ordered to pay.: SJ:>.a. 60t000/• a.s compensa.tio11 to the Govori.1.:·.i0nt for tho val uo ,)f the a tol()n 1'rindsoreen, Tho a.p.-.ix,llnnts whose 0,ppoc::,l ha.vc boon consoJ.UAtod- --- · are e.p1)Cclin.:; ac;a.inst suc:.h co1'1Vict:Lo11 ru1ci. sonto11c0. Ini t:f.a.lly learned co;.1s0l Mr • .Alq:,,ro, for :tho a.pi:J0llru1tr:J had p:rotcrrcd throe groundr.; of ap::?oal but at tho hc2,ri11g, th.a l o ~ 00~1.Sol a1mndoncd c;.round. Uo. 3 and loft GTouncis ono n.nd tuo ll'b.~ roacl1- u1., Tb.o loa.rnoc1 District Ma.3'istra.to orrcd on

tho J'acts il.1 f':i.11clin3 th.,;1.-t t:10 uindscroon Wti,D s iPlon l:r.f tho appollo.nt:::;~ 2. Tho loa.rnod.District 1~0istroto o~d on tho · facts m10. in lau by '11.oldins tll..1. t tho oaoo f cx- tllo prosocution was proved beyond a.v l."OO.BOnGbl.o doubt. Wa.ct botl1 e,Tou.ns can ba treated o.o one beoauao tho iopor'\ of the tiro is who-tho r thol'O \-ra.a su.ff'ioiont ovidanoo to 1,rovo tho ..... /2 2 - crui1 t of tJ.10 11ppclln:-:1ts as found b;t the tric.l cottrt. T'..10 facts lee.dine to this Daso arc inf a.ct aot compl ica tcd, Tho tuo appa- lla.nts ar;i fj..rGt accusocl a.t tl 1.:) trfal 1 woro at t:1.0 '1:1.:'";.torio,l tine I em]?loyod c.s wo..tch.mo.n by t.b.c lliru.r-Jtr--y- of :·Tator St.tpply nnc1. stati- onod e.t (Jofu in Ta.::1c;a Mu11icii-1c1,l:i.ty. Accord.inc t<?. t).,.o ch.2,rc_;u, tho thi"Co porr.::0113 wore jointly cJ.mr·:;od 1,i th stoalinc; a w:i.11<.lsc:roon durin0 t:!.C nic}.1t of 1st ano. 2nd Soptonbor, 1987 • · Tho Hi11dsc:roon I 1ras alloGudly roLlovod from vohiclo No. STF. 871 iv:llioh wa.o at the r:10.t.orfo,l tiuc parked at the worksb.o:p. T'.ao:ro :rari ovid.cnco to I • I t.1.ic o:f:foct tJ.:,,,at the fir:;t accu.sod. at t;.io trial wc1r:: on cluty on 1st Septor1ber 1987 fro:1 2~00 :p.r.1$ to about 9.50: p.,r111 :·::1on the I ap1')Qllants tool~ o,ror for t:;.o nij:1t. Accorcl.i:16 ito Gibson Nar:iatoncl.A when ho took over tb.o dut--y-

vohiolo 1Iu~7-~Jo:;:> STF',,.8Ti · lno. its wind.- acrco:1 011. T;_J.Q windscroon u:::~G found r.ri.snin., on ·2nd SoptoDhor I Tho first 2,ppclln.nt told t::.10 court ·fast whon :.10 J.."02)ortod. for duty ct about 8.oo :p.r.1. ho wc.,s in:Co:rr.1cd. by GibDon lfa,.1E-,, tond.a " tb.c,t ovorytldJ.1c; uaG in order .;,..., 0,t t:_:.o ~rorlu:J:::,op. 1st al)]?Ollcmt statod tlmt t~:do Gibson dicl not tc1ko 115.::1 round c:::.o worb:/wp to ins!X)ot tho cono..i t:~cmo :/! t;_10 vc:1iclcs ~; )Ii.ch: woro :r1°i ttoj:1 n. ~co of J?Ui:ior. Accor6J.nc tc t>,::, :cir~;·b 0,p1)CJ.lunt, Gibson roquo, atcd hin to bo c::ccwo ,>.in (Gib:301-;) c;oi;1e,· round in tho norlmliop ,I with tho r,pr.olla-nt on t:.io 0"'01:mcln t~mt ]io (Gibson) m:i.o not foolins well. T.',:,.o appellant stated t'.:l..-:t ho i~o:;,1t ro,und t::o ·1rorksllo:p o.nd discovoroc1. t.0.c::.t cd..nd.nc:roon en v-c'..:.iclo STF.87·! "TriB nissing. Hawovor by t)J.o tir.10 ho c:.~i::o bac}: to t:10 }",to Lo f:~u:ncl t:}.0,t Gibson had left for ~10rn. T:10 first c:".,:,nxlJ.lc..11t did not b.forn ruzy- ' off icfr,l t:J.o. t rii(t.1t about t:10 2:,i:~:d:-1.u ~rinclsc:r-oo:,i. Tho :Jooo11d. •! a:ppallent told tllo court tb.2.t wb.0:,,1 ho ro:portorl for duty on 1st Soptombor 2., t ni,j.::.t, ::.:i.o f2-und tho first ap1"lol12.nt br".,d alroaey 'I ta.ko11 over fror,1 Giboon. · H~rovor tho c;ocoru1 appellant Gtat0d I that 021

arriv-8.1 at t.J.o worlm::.,o:p, t:10 first appollo,nt infornod hin tic, t o. uiJ.1clsorccn wco nim:d.nc fro1:1 -one n8t or vohiclo. On ,j tho otllci' hand, t~ fiI'st accucod at tl1oi trial, Gibson lro.LJa.tonda., told , tho court tl.1:1,t . on 1/9/87 at about 8.30 p.n. tl::.o first apJ.)OllD,nt arrivod o.t tl2c worksl.::.op t,) tal~ ,, -::rJ"or for · nij.1t shi,,f't. I I .3 - '· Gibs,m said t.1:!.D,t tl:o ooc:Jnd ,-::,:,rpolJ.,,i1t ?ollu;rocl r.f-tor 25 r..1inutos. Gibs::;n oo.id tI.mt ho took J.;:.:.o t::ro 0,ppolJ.c,:.rts round t:!o 1rnr!:sl'16p to ins poet all ·l;;_;.o i toDs in t::oro. Accorc.li113 t -:i Gibson, both s;t.&,ccl tb.o attond.nnco ro2,'istor. Ai'tor t>.e,t Gibu:;n loft f.-r ::.iouo only to bo told 011 tho follovinc.,- d.c::r t:.'.'2,t v, winclscroon ;~1.c--w. beon of fuo am:JOlle,ntf3 ro:.1ortocl an;y d,,sinc iton to hiill uhon ho rope. rted f0i• clu -fy-. Tllir:J HnarJm1 ,ro.,c tl10 l)OX'□ 'm rosponsiblo for t~::io V"011iclon o.t tho work:iwp. Tio loE',rnod trid nr.3istr2. to in ~iE, ov2..h1r1, t~. '.Jll of t:10 oV':l.d0.1'100 boforo hir.l, :10 :Jt2,tcd at pa,._:,c 6 of t:.::.o jucl3::r.10nt ;-,,ncl I q_uoto:• io tlw Dtory tLon tlw Ls1.,1.D :'.:eJ.lr, cliroctly to t::o 2nd a.ocUBod 8-ncl 3rcl aoct,.Docl. If tJ.::0 r1ado t::1.on to k.lro aver t:,.o (_ut;:.· o:C ..':;'Ll.i'.::etl.in,~; tho yard., T'.0.0 police st,:ti,m :.;.s .::_ui to :n.oLr u::W dic.1. not

:report t!,o 1:1attor i;:) tho ;-Ji;c,tion tald.nJ' into conDido:ee,t:i_::m tl:d; thoy uoro two watc~n ut tl:..0 ynrcl.. Acoorcl:i.113 to t~:o ovid.cnco prod.1.1.co in count I soo t7J.i.:d; t:.::.o l),[~;.'Jding o-vor botiroon Pff2 c,,.1d 1st aocv..:od was },roi:orly 1':ludo rn:!d in t~}o., t ~10 dicl t::,.o 02,r.10 to tho 2nd accused cmd 3rcl. t'..ccmocl. before llc loft at 9.45 p.m. On r.\Y j}art consider thr. t t::::.o nccu.se.tion rnno,0 b--y- tho accused No. 2 m1Cl 3 ,1{,t1i21st tI.20 nccu6o.:::.. imc.,in:1ti011. · which cloos ;.1ct ozict in rocli:ry.. I t.'.:.orofo~co f:i.ncl t::c:~ tI10 a.cou::.:od. l'otro Josopl-1 2,110. Mu.so. IJ.oIX)! ho.d tc:.kon tho 1rindoc~on sinco :L-~ was loft uith t:'.:01:i. In t:ioir ovidcnco ·t;:J.o;;r :mvo fo.ilocl. totally f., . to roiuo ~ roasona.blo doubts to be loavo t'.12:t · t:1oy wore :1ot i..."Wolvocl il1 th.oft o:c a wi.'1C1Gcroen. .,,./4 4 I pro:.rnrJO they knJu Wl!71'e t:lo fot Gibson: Nar.ntonda livca and tho 3rcl D.CCU:Joc.l sc,ys :.10 net :'J.in Ol1 t!::.o 1ray and if it is C·) cmd llo uo..o i11.fo1'l".1C d that the w:i.nclscroon is > miss:i.;1c; it was quite rom:JOrk'7.blc fer thon chc.so tho 1ot nccWJod one Gibson Jiu:lat::md.a. for cl1.....,_rificatfon si11co t1.o hrn.l d.D.,;.3JJ.cd at t:n e;-o.to before t2.nt1..in5 over. Tl1ic could 2..:·w-0 ci,von c. uincl r:1.::.....,rc,121 to bolJ.ovo. clii'fcrcntly then wtct I 1n

tuldl1t; tJ.::..o 1r?10J.o ir.:;ouo nOlT • 11 In tho ~1.roc;i:-o.I11-1 just quotcc1. above, t}10 lol),rnod h>W~-n:1.e;'is-pto ot~tod: "In t:.:io avidcnoo_, t~:.cy (1st 2.11d 2nd aP.QClla.'Ylt) f'ei,ilod t,Yto.J.l;r to raLo· a rcasori..c,.,,b1o d::iubt:J to believe tbe.t t.1.::..cy ucrc not imrolvcl: in t~,.o t:10:ft of 1:-:. ninclscrcone tf Tl:o loar11od tri2.l rx,c,int:rnto wa,r; not correct in tJ.d.r; statcoont, ~ o.ccu.sod 1:icrson b.r.::.s no oblie:,ntion c:c 0.1.,t3r t:; __.:rove l:is i1w.~ conco in n c:riu:inal trial. ~'\j,1 accu.oocl :)Orc;-:in ir:J }.)l.--om.u-,10d to bo not r~uil t:,:r UJ.1til ·he is nrovo<l r-ii•l..,.,,. - ., .... Vu bv t:io ,--,r:iBocution bo7ond. \..J ·•1 ~ :roaso::.1,;--,')lo o.oubt. Tb.in io 1,lw.t tJ.;_e Evicloncc, Act oto..too wh.on under ;:.;cction 2 (a.) of .Act Ho. 6 of 19f17 it ~Jr::ividos trot: 11 A fact is 02..icl. to bo :p:rovod uhont · (a) in crin:IA"'l.l mtto1~c, e::ccpt vhoro n.1-zy- stntute or other lc:m pro·,,ridoo ot:iorwfoo, tJ.:-.e court is satiofied by ·t:,.o ::;irosocutj_on boyong reasonable d.oubt the t tJ.10 fact 01:::ists. 11 $:.is clcn.rl;;,r rJ;.:ous t:::i..:~t tho bu.rdon is nlwD..;y.s on t:1.0 P-...1'.'ooocu.tion. In t '·i3 })t,rtic ular c2..so t~10 appollcnts 1mrc ,1croly wa tcl.lll.)lt and tho poosibilit;7 of tLc ·i:ri11d.oc:roon boinr5_ stolen by noaoo:no oleo co.n never bo oxc:t.udod. Of COUl'OC if it is p:rovccl

t:."'..t the win~ scl'Qon w2,o r.; iDlon by oono ot:lOr 1,er:301:is u1.ilo t:.:cy were on duty t!.10:r coulcl.. be C,Uil ty of no@.i:;cncc. , if 5 On a ~rid0r J:X)rc.:;_,octi1ro of t:·.o ovic7.onco 1r' .id.1 1ms w.dducod by tho proooouti:m, tl::.o loc,rnocl ·h1. .nl r~" :;ictro,fo boliov-ocl_ t.\o tostinony ::if GiixJo:n lfa;:m.tcinc1'1, t,, t:_::.J o:f1oct t:,.:·,t 1:.o 1'.c,nclod tho wo ;dml:.op to tl10 c,p-.oolJ.2..nto Hi tl::. tLo 1ri;1c1.Doroo~1 on t:.!D vehicle. In boliovins Gi~xionh,i oviclonco, t>.o loo.nrocl trfo,l nr\_,i::-,trc,,te did not soo1:i to e,pp:i.~cd.ato t:.1.0 1J2x:,cial J)'.XJitic.m i:;,1 u::~ich tJ,.is Gibson ua,::; in tl:o trial. Gib:::n:n wo,:-J il12c.ct 02:...1,rc,ud ,:::,:1:l ti'iocl jci;yf;ly wit:.1 t1,.o c _.ro1le,ntrJ for t!,.o t::.oft ,::,f -t:Lo win~~oc1~con. Gil.loon 110,.a tryinc; to ·~:.::rmr ·t~·~e; whole hm~lon 0:1 t 1:,.o ;:,,~):;;iol\C',:·,-t;o u ~iJ.o t:1.0 a.PIX)11£tnts wore ju.st cl.0L1;.:; liko·:ric.:o. w:::oov-or is boliovoc.l will m1n,::;-c fully to o.xculpri.:bo :~ir:isolf full3r fron t!J.o ofi'm100. lhd.or tho circur:ist2..ncos b ~tl: Gibr:on o..nc: tl:.o appollcmts lJ.c""",VO ca.ell o.n intorcs'G to oorvo. Eho:.1 lzo c~ n:ct:i.vo to toll .lico in ordor to CPt auay fr,::in tl10 churc,u. Tllo oyiclonco ::if Gibson or ,:f the nri~lle:21ts boinc; t:.i.at of poruons ·1;·i th :mtorost to nor,,o io norl:¥).lly- t:roa:coc:t (lifforcntly

fron t:.cc"..t -)f cm imlo1xmclont uitnosa -;ri tLout in tore st to servo. Gibson bo:i.nc; 2, co-o.ccusocl, ?.lis ovidonoe oust bo t:-cm.,tocl in t:10 Dano f::,otin:.; c.o t>.c.t cf an ~cc:mplico. Suell oviclonco '.2.c:,s 2,l:TC,;:;ts boon troatocl ,~i t:':1 _:~·rout cautiDn by tho cou.rto 2-nd au n rn ttcr .::,:c ~~)ractico com,ts ::..._--:;;ro o,,l-::ro;,7s roqu:i.:t;'Qd conviction. Tl:.ir.:: proJ;i')sj_tion wac :::to.toe: in t~D cc.Do of Rv Kon~1et:" Ii'. P'rc,:l;o:r (1960) ;-1· CR,,R 83, ~r:,oro it uao ::.olc1.s of '..,is _,·:m to coI'V'Q in givin,.:; ovidonoo 2 it fa doai.. 1·•a 1.:lo in practice thc,t n uo..r~tlnc ::,hould bo c.,ivon to t>.o jur./ ui th rco1rcl to t~10 c:.o.ne,-or of a.cti.n3 on ~1ie 1,u10orro1Jorotod oviclonco sinilo.r -ro t::..0,t uhich is [;-ivon in tl'.o caso ::>f r.cconplicios ~ w!:ot:'.1.or tlw wi tnooc ct:n })r,)2:,~rly 1)o cla.sood. as an accorrplico or 110 t.. 11 Tz..o:.:;o r>rj.nci11:i_:)r:: huvo boon adoptocl into our locnl oys ion .:i,o t:ioy 2.1,.'1.vo ))oon aT1pliocl fully in r.1c"1.l:\')T docisions sue:., a3 I<ulo s/o Kil:11im1e, vR· (1972) :u.c.», ITo157 nnc1 Paulo Mrii:rl. vR. (1977) L.:a..r.c. oe,./6 6 Ho. 34 o.;_:O. ot::.ors. T1:.o pror.;ocu.ti,")n case 1ms t::i.a t Gibson wn.s lumdod a-ver t::.o vo::.iclo wit'..:, t:..:.c ,rindso:roon. It is is believed the. t t:,o a1)pollc:nts uo:ro not b•."',ndocl ttc vohiolo wi t.t t~.:.o

1ri:ncl... screen ns t:..:07 o.llococl, dofini tel7 Gibson 11oulcl bo ii:i. tr0·u.blo. It is 1..u1clor t::.cr::o circu.1-:ioto.ncos t:.:,..:,t Giboon lr-~•uld wirJl1 to be boliovucl t:J.."'.t ~-'-O hdndod over t:10 v-o'..~iolo ui th t:.10 w:i.J.1.c:J3Cl"0011 to t!.10 eppeEnnta. Thero ,;-mo, t!10:rcfo1.--c, ;:~ pouo:i."".ful ,.1otivo 011 tho 11art ::-;f Gibson for not or-02.kins tb::i truth c...11c'. oon,r.Joq1.10ntly hio ovido:.100 ir1plico..t:Ll13 t~-~o t,ro n};rf()llm1ts s!:10uJ.C. be c,'.:'..I'Ofully '· i i. ().."'C.:'',,ninocl bofo:ro it is accoptod as tho ba.sir:i f:-;r 6onvictinc; tho •r a,ppollo.il.ts er:! it u2,o in t::j.s co.r::;o,, Ii' t'.:.o court nftor :roco@iizinc f ! the,t t:,c uitno:Jn ~s intorcr.;t t,J r::crvc c..ncl after tw:::i.nc into t:'.::.c account t1~o princi1Jleo oot out E'.bovc, bolievo:::i sue:., tootimoey and. is closiro'l.W to o.-ct µJ.)on it~ -r.~cn before cct:bc; :J::1 it, tl:c court r..s o. i:1.,.,,ttor of )rectioe 1..,:..,_r.; to t-:;;:-1: for co1'r'.)borc',tivo donoo wn.s c::nccmod a,.!.'l(l t:.:-:.o:ro:fo:ro ho C.icl :::2ot td;:c t'._•.o nooocr;so.r,r oaut:lnn boforo act:i.n.=; on it r1.11cl f:i.112..lly 'o <l.id. ::.n·t look: for oor-,cobomtion wl::. icll ·;,n~o n:,t tlloro ['.lzyiT2.~~. Suer: c·vlt:onc0 could not be r.ctoc"i. upon rD t 11.o r::-:,lc b2:.:3~.c ,yf 0;)11Vict:i....11g t::.o a:i,)i')Ollo..."lta s JUDGill 7/3/89 •>. I l I

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rv Kenneth F. Preacher (1960) 44 CRR 83

Case cited

Kulo s/o Kilimime v R (1972) HC, No.157

Case cited

Paulo Mrimi v R (1977) HC, No.34

Case cited

Evidence Act, Section 2(a), Act No. 6 of 1967

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.