Joshua Sichembe vs Republic DC Criminal Appeal No

TN THE HIGH CGUTVT OF Ti;*NZ«HIA MBEV-. l i ELLaTE Jl) I\Tojj.l CH O ■ l^i (Kbeya E e ^ is tv y ) DCr CIvIMIN.nL API E.X EC. OF ■ j O1'- ( O r ig in a l C rim in a l Case :‘ o « 217 c ; 2003 o f th e D i s t r i c t Court Mbozi^ JOSHUA SLCHEMBE........... „ « o . = Aa-.3LL.iNT

VERSUS THE ttEPUBLIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 AESi'CNDENT RiqCuNJA, J , The a p p e lla n t was c o n v ic t e d o f w ron g fu l is s u e o f n o t e s c / s 352 (b ) o f th e 1-enal Code» A man known a s Samson Simkoko (IW«,1) d e s i r e d t o buy f o r e x a t Tunduma* He fou n d a w i l l i n g s e l l e r o f US D o lla r s i n a man c a l l e d W infred s / o Mfaume©. I:WC1 has a h i s t o r y o f h a n d lin g US D o lla r s so he n o t i c e d th a t what t h i s VJinfred waatod t o s e l l t o him were - ^ e - c u r re n cy n o t e s . He duped th e p r o s p e c t i v e s e l l e r t h a ‘-. he 0 - : o •' was g oin ^ home t o c o l l e c t money w ith w hich ho c c u lu buy th o •c.■t’ ox-, He went t o the- P o l i c e S t a t io n in s t e a d * I n due co u r s o the Aounds o f j u s t i c e jo u n c e d on th r e e y o u t h s , i n c lu d in g th e a p p e l la n t , a t a ^ime when I1701 had r e tu r n e d t o the r e n d - zevouzn The apv'.-',‘»^ wae one o f th o s e who were a r r e s te d * N in eteen -*.0 US $ 100 b i l l s were found on th o p e r s o n o f the a p p e lla n t f o l l o w in g a P o lic e s e a rch G The a p p e lla n t d e n ie d t o have p a r t i c i p a t e d i n th e i l l e g a l f o r e x e x ch a n g e 0 I t was on th e above e v id e n ce th a t th e a p p e lla n t was c o n v ic t e d o H is c o -a c c u s e d jumped

b a i l and a re s t i l l a t la r g e * My assessm en t o f the e v id e n ce le a v e s no doubt th a t the c o n v i c t i o n i s sou n d . It w i l l n o t b e d is tu r b e d . -j f!_ r t o f f e n d e r and i n r e l a t ? n t o a p a lt r y sum o f in v o lv e d a se n te n ce o f th r e e y e a r s im prisonm ent i s mani fest' y ^ ^ 0 ? b a i v € c a g a in s t In th e r e s u l t th e a p p e a l/c o n v ic t i o n i s d ism isse d * j-he a p p ea l a g a in s t s e n te n ce i s a llo w e d to the e x te n t th a 4-. th e se n te n ce i s re d u ce d s o a s t o amount t o th e im m ediate d i s c h a r g e o f th e a p p e lla n t from p r is o n # O rd ers a c c o r d in g ly * or;do Jo Kc- H«-iCKiiNJa

JUDGE 2x)/'i 0/2004 L a te : 25/ 10/ 2C0*f Corams 3 C B o n g o le , A p p e lla n t : i-re s e n t For ii e p u b li c : Mr. B o n ifa ce C /C 0 M rs. Mponzi Courjbs^ Judgment d e l i v e r e d . Sgd« S* B o n g o le , D .i?. 25/10/ 200^ C e r t i f i e d tr u e cojjy o f th e o r i g i n a l Judgment,,