19770824 TZHC Dodoma3
The appellant's representations that he had a vehicle and could transport goods were false and made with intent to defraud, which induced the complainant to give him money. The conviction for obtaining money by false pretences was therefore proper. The sentence of three years' imprisonment was within the statutory maximum and justified by the circumstances.
- Citation
- 19770824 TZHC Dodoma3
- Parties
- Appellant: Jotham s/o Tuj; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed
- Legal Topics
- False Pretences, Obtaining Money by False Pretences, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jotham s/o Tuj
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's representations amounted to false pretence under section 301 of the Penal Code
- 2 Whether the conviction for obtaining money by false pretences was proper
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's representations that he had a vehicle and could transport goods were false and made with intent to defraud, which induced the complainant to give him money. The conviction for obtaining money by false pretences was therefore proper. The sentence of three years' imprisonment was within the statutory maximum and justified by the circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed
Orders
- Conviction for obtaining money by false pretences confirmed
- Sentence of three years' imprisonment confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment