jovitus johansen vs republic 2016 tzca 665 23 february 2016

jovitus johansen vs republic 2016 tzca 665 23 february 2016

The appellant, being 18 years old at the time of the offence, was illegally sentenced to imprisonment; the proper sentence under section 131(2)(a) of the Penal Code was corporal punishment only, and given time served, immediate release was ordered.

Citation
jovitus johansen vs republic 2016 tzca 665 23 february 2016
Parties
Appellant: Jovitus Johansen; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
23 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed.
Legal Topics
Rape, Sentencing, Corporal Punishment, Age Determination
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jovitus Johansen

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for rape was properly sustained
  2. 2 Whether the sentence of life imprisonment was lawful given the appellant's age

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, being 18 years old at the time of the offence, was illegally sentenced to imprisonment; the proper sentence under section 131(2)(a) of the Penal Code was corporal punishment only, and given time served, immediate release was ordered.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed.

Orders

  • Sentence of imprisonment quashed and set aside
  • Immediate release of appellant from prison unless held for other lawful cause