julius mwamlima vs lukani development association 2020 tzhc 4527 27 november 2020
The appellant failed to prove an oral agreement with the respondent for the additional claims. The claim for Tshs. 3,874,000/= was a community obligation, not the respondent's, and the claim for Tshs. 2,000,000/= was unsupported by evidence. General damages were not pleaded and thus could not be awarded.
- Citation
- julius mwamlima vs lukani development association 2020 tzhc 4527 27 november 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Julius Mwamlima; Respondent: Lukani Development Association
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Oral Agreements, Construction Contracts, Pleadings and Issues, Damages
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Mwamlima
Appellant
Lukani Development Association
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant proved entitlement to Tshs. 3,874,000/= and Tshs. 2,000,000/= against the respondent
- 2 Whether the District Court erred in reducing the amount awarded by the Primary Court
- 3 Whether general damages were properly awarded
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove an oral agreement with the respondent for the additional claims. The claim for Tshs. 3,874,000/= was a community obligation, not the respondent's, and the claim for Tshs. 2,000,000/= was unsupported by evidence. General damages were not pleaded and thus could not be awarded.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment and decrees of both lower courts quashed
- Orders of lower courts quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment