julius stephen others vs united republic 2005 tzhc 119 1 august 2005
Applicants failed to show sufficient cause for delay, and the High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant the extension sought as the application was not brought under the correct legal provisions.
- Citation
- julius stephen others vs united republic 2005 tzhc 119 1 august 2005
- Parties
- Applicant: Julius Stephen; Applicant: Lucas Jeremia; Applicant: Jumanne Hemedi; Respondent: The United Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Intention to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Intention to Appeal, Jurisdiction, Procedural Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Stephen
Applicant
Lucas Jeremia
Applicant
Jumanne Hemedi
Applicant
The United Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Intention to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown for delay in filing notice of intention to appeal
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant extension of time for notice to appeal to the Court of Appeal under section 361 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1985
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to show sufficient cause for delay, and the High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant the extension sought as the application was not brought under the correct legal provisions.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Chamber summons dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment