juma vs manager pbz ltd others 2003 tzca 11 12 november 2003

juma vs manager pbz ltd others 2003 tzca 11 12 november 2003

The mortgage deed expressly excluded restrictions under section 69 of Cap. 150, allowing the bank to sell the property without court intervention and notice requirements were satisfied; the sale was conducted by public auction with transparency; compound interest issue was not properly pleaded and cannot be considered.

Citation
juma vs manager pbz ltd others 2003 tzca 11 12 november 2003
Parties
Appellant: Juma Jaffer Juma; Respondent: Manager, PBZ Ltd.; Respondent: Manager, Caravan Ltd.; Respondent: Said Khamis Hemed El Gheity
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
12 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Mortgage, Auction Sale, Notice Requirements, Interest Calculation, Statutory Duty of Care
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Juma Jaffer Juma

Appellant

Manager, PBZ Ltd.

Respondent

Manager, Caravan Ltd.

Respondent

Said Khamis Hemed El Gheity

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mortgage was a simple mortgage under section 58(3) of the Transfer of Property Decree, Cap. 150
  2. 2 Whether court intervention was required for sale of mortgaged property
  3. 3 Whether valid notice was served prior to auction sale

Ratio Decidendi

The mortgage deed expressly excluded restrictions under section 69 of Cap. 150, allowing the bank to sell the property without court intervention and notice requirements were satisfied; the sale was conducted by public auction with transparency; compound interest issue was not properly pleaded and cannot be considered.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed with costs