juma said kasanzu as administrator of the estate of the late said kasanzu vs athanas ikale 4 others 2023 tzhc 22392 13 october 2023
Applicant failed to account for the delay and did not provide sufficient cause; law requires strict compliance for extension of time and cannot be ignored for sympathy or justice alone.
- Citation
- juma said kasanzu as administrator of the estate of the late said kasanzu vs athanas ikale 4 others 2023 tzhc 22392 13 october 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Juma Said Kasanzu; Respondent: Athanas I Kale; Respondent: Lucas Manzoli; Respondent: Hassani Lupombelo; Respondent: Mrisho Nolle; Respondent: Andrew Kafyome
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed without costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Delay, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Juma Said Kasanzu
Applicant
Athanas I Kale
Respondent
Lucas Manzoli
Respondent
Hassani Lupombelo
Respondent
Mrisho Nolle
Respondent
Andrew Kafyome
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal
- 2 Whether the delay was properly accounted for
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to account for the delay and did not provide sufficient cause; law requires strict compliance for extension of time and cannot be ignored for sympathy or justice alone.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed without costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment