juma so shaban vs republic 2017 tzhc 2253 16 november 2017

juma so shaban vs republic 2017 tzhc 2253 16 november 2017

The offences charged are bailable under the relevant statutes, the respondent does not object to bail, and no reasons have been provided to warrant refusal of bail. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to fulfillment of prescribed conditions.

Citation
juma so shaban vs republic 2017 tzhc 2253 16 november 2017
Parties
Applicant: Juma s/o Shaban; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Outcome
Bail granted
Legal Topics
Bail, Unlawful Possession of Narcotic Drugs, Bailable Offences, Bail Conditions
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Economic Crimes Drug Offences Bail Unlawful Possession of Narcotic Drugs Bailable Offences Bail Conditions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Juma s/o Shaban

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail for the charged offences under the relevant statutes
  2. 2 What are the appropriate bail conditions to be imposed

Ratio Decidendi

The offences charged are bailable under the relevant statutes, the respondent does not object to bail, and no reasons have been provided to warrant refusal of bail. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to fulfillment of prescribed conditions.

Court Disposition

Bail granted

Orders

  • Applicant to execute a bail bond of Tshs. 5,000,000
  • Applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each to execute a bond of Tshs. 2,000,000