crdb bank plc vs abana limited 3 others 2022 tzhclandd 862 30 august 2022

crdb bank plc vs abana limited 3 others 2022 tzhclandd 862 30 august 2022

The court found the matter involves land used as collateral and is not purely commercial, thus jurisdiction is proper. Claims against guarantors require evidence and cannot be determined as pure points of law. The counter claim is not time barred as the outstanding amounts matured in 2017 and 2019, and the claim was filed within the limitation period.

Citation
crdb bank plc vs abana limited 3 others 2022 tzhclandd 862 30 august 2022
Parties
Plaintiff in Counter Claim: CRDB Bank PLC; 1st Defendant in Counter Claim: Abana Limited; 2nd Defendant in Counter Claim: Richard Kimwaga Stika; 3rd Defendant in Counter Claim: Vincent M. S. Mtani
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
30 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Outcome
All preliminary objections overruled with costs.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Limitation of Actions, Guarantor Liability, Mortgage Discharge
Source Language
English
Land Law Commercial Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Limitation of Actions Guarantor Liability Mortgage Discharge

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CRDB Bank PLC

Plaintiff in Counter Claim

Abana Limited

1st Defendant in Counter Claim

Richard Kimwaga Stika

2nd Defendant in Counter Claim

Vincent M. S. Mtani

3rd Defendant in Counter Claim

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objections

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain the counter claim
  2. 2 Whether there are valid claims against the 2nd and 3rd defendants as guarantors
  3. 3 Whether the counter claim is time barred

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the matter involves land used as collateral and is not purely commercial, thus jurisdiction is proper. Claims against guarantors require evidence and cannot be determined as pure points of law. The counter claim is not time barred as the outstanding amounts matured in 2017 and 2019, and the claim was filed within the limitation period.

Court Disposition

All preliminary objections overruled with costs.

Orders

  • The matter proceeds to hearing on merits.
  • Defendants to pay costs.