juto so waziri vs republic 2005 tzhc 232 30 december 2005
The conviction was quashed because the evidence of the key prosecution witnesses was found to be fabricated and not credible, and the relevant law did not apply retroactively to the alleged acts.
- Citation
- juto so waziri vs republic 2005 tzhc 232 30 december 2005
- Parties
- Appellant: Juto s/o Waziri; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Fabrication of Evidence, Consent, Sexual Offences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Juto s/o Waziri
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for rape was supported by credible evidence
- 2 Whether the evidence of key prosecution witnesses was fabricated
- 3 Whether the Sexual Offences Special Provisions Act No.4 of 1998 applied to acts before its enactment
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was quashed because the evidence of the key prosecution witnesses was found to be fabricated and not credible, and the relevant law did not apply retroactively to the alleged acts.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- conviction quashed
- sentence of 30 years imprisonment set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment