20141008 TZHC Arusha

20141008 TZHC Arusha

The plaintiffs failed to plead the value of the subject matter in a specific currency and amount, rendering the plaint ambiguous and preventing the Court from determining its pecuniary jurisdiction. As a result, the suit is incompetent and must be struck out.

Citation
20141008 TZHC Arusha
Parties
Plaintiff: Kaavai Murero; Plaintiff: Kipamba Njoriba; Plaintiff: Samwel Laibanguti; Plaintiff: Malipe Naing'ode; Defendant: Sinyati Sandi; Defendant: Joseph Lekele; Defendant: Ndimama Olonjokie; Defendant: Terengo Sandi
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
8 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Pecuniary Jurisdiction
Outcome
suit struck out
Legal Topics
Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Malicious Prosecution, Pleading Requirements
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kaavai Murero

Plaintiff

Kipamba Njoriba

Plaintiff

Samwel Laibanguti

Plaintiff

Malipe Naing'ode

Plaintiff

Sinyati Sandi

Defendant

Joseph Lekele

Defendant

Ndimama Olonjokie

Defendant

Terengo Sandi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Pecuniary Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit based on the pleadings
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs have properly pleaded specific damages and currency

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs failed to plead the value of the subject matter in a specific currency and amount, rendering the plaint ambiguous and preventing the Court from determining its pecuniary jurisdiction. As a result, the suit is incompetent and must be struck out.

Court Disposition

suit struck out

Orders

  • Suit struck out for want of pecuniary jurisdiction.
  • No order as to costs.