kachukura nshekanabo kakobeka 2016 tzca 666 24 february 2016

kachukura nshekanabo kakobeka 2016 tzca 666 24 february 2016

The death penalty should not be upheld due to its irreversible nature, potential for error, and violation of constitutional and human rights; a life sentence should be substituted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
kachukura nshekanabo kakobeka 2016 tzca 666 24 february 2016
Parties
Appellant: Kachukura Nshekanabo @ Kakobeka; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
dissenting on sentencing; would substitute life sentence for death penalty
Legal Topics
Death Penalty, Sentencing, Right to Life, Appeals
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Death Penalty Sentencing Right to Life Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kachukura Nshekanabo @ Kakobeka

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the death penalty should be upheld for the appellant convicted of murder
  2. 2 Whether the death penalty violates constitutional and human rights provisions

Ratio Decidendi

The death penalty should not be upheld due to its irreversible nature, potential for error, and violation of constitutional and human rights; a life sentence should be substituted.

Court Disposition

dissenting on sentencing; would substitute life sentence for death penalty

Orders

  • Would not uphold the death penalty
  • Would substitute a life sentence