KARIAKOOO AUCTION MART
The applicant demonstrated a technical delay due to clerical errors not attributable to her, acted promptly after the appeal was struck out, and adequately explained the delay. The law allows correction of clerical errors at any time and extension of time for good cause.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- KARIAKOOO AUCTION MART
- Parties
- Applicant: Kariakoo Auction Mart Limited; 1st Respondent: Mwache Mashaka Yahaya Dyanga (Administrator of the estate of the late Mashaka Dyanga); 2nd Respondent: Juma S. Samba; 3rd Respondent: Said Hamza Ngohengo (Administrator of the estate of the late Abdulwahab Hamza); 4th Respondent: Nassoro Saidi; 5th Respondent: Mohamed Mmande; 6th Respondent: Siasa Mohamed; 7th Respondent: Anwar Juma Yagga (Administrator of the estate of the late Ramadhan J. Yagga); 8th Respondent: Shaffii Salehe Dunda (Administrator of the estate of the late Abdul S. Dunda)
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Rectification of Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Rectification of Judgment, Clerical Errors, Notice of Appeal
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kariakoo Auction Mart Limited
Applicant
Mwache Mashaka Yahaya Dyanga (Administrator of the estate of the late Mashaka Dyanga)
1st Respondent
Juma S. Samba
2nd Respondent
Said Hamza Ngohengo (Administrator of the estate of the late Abdulwahab Hamza)
3rd Respondent
Nassoro Saidi
4th Respondent
Mohamed Mmande
5th Respondent
Siasa Mohamed
6th Respondent
Anwar Juma Yagga (Administrator of the estate of the late Ramadhan J. Yagga)
7th Respondent
Shaffii Salehe Dunda (Administrator of the estate of the late Abdul S. Dunda)
8th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Rectification of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to extension of time to file notice of appeal
- 2 Whether the court should rectify clerical errors in the judgment and decree
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant demonstrated a technical delay due to clerical errors not attributable to her, acted promptly after the appeal was struck out, and adequately explained the delay. The law allows correction of clerical errors at any time and extension of time for good cause.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Clerical errors in the judgment and decree of 26th February 2016 in Civil Case No. 86 of 2008 are corrected to reflect the proper names of the substituted parties.
- Applicant is granted thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling to file a notice of appeal against the judgment and decree in Civil Case No. 86 of 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment