karim hassan vs national microfinance bank plc 2018 tzhcld 43 23 may 2018

karim hassan vs national microfinance bank plc 2018 tzhcld 43 23 may 2018

The applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide sufficient or good reasons as required by law for extension of time. Mere follow-up with the employer does not constitute a valid reason for delay, and there was no evidence to support the applicant's claims.

Citation
karim hassan vs national microfinance bank plc 2018 tzhcld 43 23 may 2018
Parties
Applicant: Karim Hassan; Respondent: National Microfinance Bank PLC
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
23 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Limitation Period, Labour Disputes
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Limitation Period Labour Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karim Hassan

Applicant

National Microfinance Bank PLC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has adduced sufficient or good reasons for extension of time to file an application for review out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide sufficient or good reasons as required by law for extension of time. Mere follow-up with the employer does not constitute a valid reason for delay, and there was no evidence to support the applicant's claims.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file an application for review is dismissed for lack of merit.