karim ramadhani vs republic 2015 tzca 66 13 july 2015

The grounds raised by the applicant amount to grounds of appeal and not manifest errors on the face of the record; therefore, the application does not meet the threshold for review under Rule 66(1).

Citation: karim ramadhani vs republic 2015 tzca 66 13 july 2015
Parties: Applicant: Karim Ramadhani; Respondent: The Republic
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 13 July 2015
Procedural Posture: Criminal Application / Application for Review of Appellate Judgment
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Review of Appellate Decisions, Manifest Error, Jurisdiction of Appellate Court
Source Language: English

Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Review of Appellate Decisions Manifest Error Jurisdiction of Appellate Court

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Karim Ramadhani

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Review of Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appellate judgment contained a manifest error on the face of the record resulting in miscarriage of justice
2 Whether the grounds raised are proper for review under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The grounds raised by the applicant amount to grounds of appeal and not manifest errors on the face of the record; therefore, the application does not meet the threshold for review under Rule 66(1).

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Application for review is dismissed