karlos so peter chamaramba vs republic 2019 tzca 194 18 june 2019

karlos so peter chamaramba vs republic 2019 tzca 194 18 june 2019

The applicant failed to satisfactorily explain the inordinate delay of nearly ten years and the intended review sought to raise evidential matters not permitted under Rule 66(1), thus the application lacked merit.

Citation
karlos so peter chamaramba vs republic 2019 tzca 194 18 june 2019
Parties
Applicant: Karlos s/o Peter @ Chamaramba; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 June 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review Applications, Delay Explanation
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review Applications Delay Explanation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karlos s/o Peter @ Chamaramba

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for the inordinate delay in filing for review
  2. 2 Whether the intended review raises grounds permissible under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to satisfactorily explain the inordinate delay of nearly ten years and the intended review sought to raise evidential matters not permitted under Rule 66(1), thus the application lacked merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed