KASIMU BAKARI 222 Edited

KASIMU BAKARI 222 Edited

The applicant accounted for the entire period of delay due to proven sickness and acted diligently upon recovery. Any administrative delay in filing was reasonable and not attributable to the applicant. Sufficient cause was established for extension of time.

Citation
KASIMU BAKARI 222 Edited
Parties
Applicant: Kasimu Bakari; Respondent: Emmanuel Nchimbi
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
21 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals From District Court, Sufficient Cause for Delay
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals From District Court Sufficient Cause for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kasimu Bakari

Applicant

Emmanuel Nchimbi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant accounted for the entire period of delay due to proven sickness and acted diligently upon recovery. Any administrative delay in filing was reasonable and not attributable to the applicant. Sufficient cause was established for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant to file appeal before the High Court within 30 days from the date of this ruling
  • No order as to costs