kasimu fakihi bakari vs ramadhani fakihi bakari 3 others 2023 tzhc 21849 8 september 2023

kasimu fakihi bakari vs ramadhani fakihi bakari 3 others 2023 tzhc 21849 8 september 2023

The applicant demonstrated good cause for the delay, which was caused by the court's failure to supply documents on time. The delay was not inordinate, and the applicant acted diligently. Extension of time is therefore granted.

Citation
kasimu fakihi bakari vs ramadhani fakihi bakari 3 others 2023 tzhc 21849 8 september 2023
Parties
Applicant: Kasimu Fakihi Bakari; 1st Respondent: Ramadhani Fakihi Bakari; 2nd Respondent: Tatu Fakihi Bakari; 3rd Respondent: Mariam Fakihi Bakari; 4th Respondent: Hamisi Fakihi Bakari
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
8 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kasimu Fakihi Bakari

Applicant

Ramadhani Fakihi Bakari

1st Respondent

Tatu Fakihi Bakari

2nd Respondent

Mariam Fakihi Bakari

3rd Respondent

Hamisi Fakihi Bakari

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated good cause for the delay, which was caused by the court's failure to supply documents on time. The delay was not inordinate, and the applicant acted diligently. Extension of time is therefore granted.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant is granted thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of this ruling to lodge the intended application for leave to appeal.
  • Costs shall follow the main event.