kassim hamisi others vs malimuna iddi 2011 tzhc 2151 8 july 2011

The appeal was struck out as incompetent due to the petition's failure to show the appellants' address, a mandatory procedural requirement.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: kassim hamisi others vs malimuna iddi 2011 tzhc 2151 8 july 2011
Parties: Appellant: Kassim Hamisi & 2 Others; Respondent: Malimuna Iddi
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 8 July 2011
Procedural Posture: Land Case Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal
Outcome: Appeal struck out as incompetent with costs.
Legal Topics: Appeal Procedure, Defective Pleadings, Signature Requirements, Address Requirements
Source Language: english

Land Law Civil Procedure Appeal Procedure Defective Pleadings Signature Requirements Address Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Kassim Hamisi & 2 Others

Appellant

Malimuna Iddi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Case Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appeal was competent in light of procedural defects in the petition of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was struck out as incompetent due to the petition's failure to show the appellants' address, a mandatory procedural requirement.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent with costs.

Orders

Appeal struck out with costs.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.