19950912 TZHC Songea
The caravan was not used as a human dwelling and thus does not qualify as a 'building' under section 294(1) of the Penal Code; evidence linking appellant to the offence was insufficient and speculative.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19950912 TZHC Songea
- Parties
- Appellant: Kassim Kumisi Salum; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Burglary, Stealing, Evidence, Definition of Building
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kassim Kumisi Salum
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the caravan qualifies as a 'building' for purposes of section 294(1) of the Penal Code
- 2 Whether the incriminating envelope was necessarily left in the caravan by the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The caravan was not used as a human dwelling and thus does not qualify as a 'building' under section 294(1) of the Penal Code; evidence linking appellant to the offence was insufficient and speculative.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- conviction quashed
- appellant to be released from prison forthwith unless held for other lawful cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
I ...; T..-:J . ~;I.Gil COURT O'JJ' TJ, NZ:\NIA __ _ AT SONGEA IJC CRIMIWiiL A?:PE.lu. HO. 25 OF 1995 ORIGINJu, CRIM!N~-CASE WO .115 OF 1992 OF T"ili} 11STRICT COURT OF SOiJGEA DISTRICT :Oef'ore: L._J. I~Luya, .dsq. ResiJ.ent Ha.-,;istrate KASSIM IU.MISI SALUM ••••••••••• •-•·•. li.PPELLl:Jn' verslls: 'l'llE R,KFUBLIC • •••••• ,.. •. • • • • • • • • • • Rl.ilS;i'ONlJENT JULGEMEKT Before SonJea 1istrict Court (L.J .M~.1uya,fil'I) the a1>?ellant Kassin ~Ia".:tisi Salur.i was cha.r3ecl with and convicteu. .)f two eounts, nanely, buJlary c/ s 294_ ( l) of the ?ena1 Co<le and stealin_; c/s 265 of the :i."enal Coue for which he was sentenced to seven ( 7) years 1 s .L1pri11,oruaent ..;,.r. · the first count· . - and two (2) years' iJ1vrisonuent on the second, the sentences to run oon.-u.- 'l'~ently • li.3:_;rieved 'by that decision he has ap?aale<l tcJ this c0urt. The facts ,Jivin;.; rise to the aypeal l:!eveal that the a:p:.:iellant (alonJ with Joseph liU3Ustino Shuwo} were ec1i)loy-ed as watchnan ':.ly \'iade :~ams C6nstruction Co,·:1pany Son.;ea :,ranch. 1.,n 10/5/92 they wer.e su?;osed_ to ::.e on duty fror:, 6 :p.r.1~ to 6 a..n. at the resiuence c,f Wade 1i.daus ;Jrojaet r.1ana..3er Hr_. \vatson. In the r:10rnin; it was founc.;1. that a caravan 1-:icated within the saiG. Mr. 1-,ia,teon' s prenises was ~.,rcken into and. various articles etolen tl;leref:tot10 In the course of takinJ stock of the itens that wero stolen an envelope ;)earin._; the ai)pellant 1 s nane was found. Ut 1 8r:wi"'~., ,.,, search a.t .the a.l)l)ellant' s resitl.ence yielleL1 n::,thin,2 h-lc-r:i.:::iinatin,·. The. a.11pellant was arrasteJ. and char;etlo In defence he stateJ. that he re:;,..,~rteC. f0r rluty arouml. 6 p.n. o! that day and work(d U:J to 10 :;;,n. when ho loft, tellin;., his co...:warchuan thc.t he was Join:; te; hos)ital as hG -was foelins indispcseu. Apparently the a:,1.1?ellant cliC: nut tSO t::., hcs;i tal. He si'.,;ily went h::no and slol)t. In it.he uvrnin:..:; he learne,.:'. of what took at his wcrk lJlacEi 1 a:tJua'..;ly doin6 his atsende, .,. 2 - 2 said:- 0 1st aced (appellant) ha~ auDi tt~a. that . In ean'Yioting the a:;;lpellant the lea:r;ined trial resillent na,:;ist:rate • - he left his i:;oodins place oh the r.iator1al · ni:.::;ht and went to sleep at his he,,:10. Iie has not given surficient ex-JlDncl.tion as to why he left his work );)lace without per- '-- nission. frcn the owner of the prenises.- J'i.ncl if he was not f ealinJ well why didn't h~ Jo to the hosl,)ital if not that ho just abseortdocl o.fter jreakinJ the caravan and steal.in:;. i1lso the lat. af?Cd has t1ontioned nothin,3 -iri his a.efence as to how the enve- lope containipJ ilia n:t.n6 60t insida the 1.roken caravan if not thn.t it fell there vithcut his notice whon he entered tho earn.van aftor troa.lcin,s it and them a.'.,sco- nclo:'1 fror.1 his work p:f'ter cor.1i-:u. ttins the offence.Ii l!':ron the c.:i:,;i1:1ilant petition c.:f n.:i_.,;Go.l arlll the evid.enco two issues •e:IG J.isecrni'.:ile. First should tha caravan in the oircunatanoce of this e~a~ :;e ccnstrueu (;justlon J1meris witµ a::uildin~" for the pur_.)c.sos of :n1b-socti0n (1) of section 194 of th~ l onal Code? .l.ncl, second. 1'ias the· I incri1:1in.tin,:; onvelv::., 0-:: loft in tho earn.van nocossn.rily :_y tho a;,pollant? On tho first issue it is enuotecl un4or section 194 (1) of the hmo.1 .Cc1o thus & 11 294. imy person who .(1) brooks nnu enter OIJY ~uilli?B, tent or vessel y.sQd as a h.Y.:tgn_:lwcl]J.ru; with intent to oonni t a. felony thoroin, or (2) ••• "~, •••• ., (not applicn.~-lo) is -:,1.ti.l ty of tho folony tonJed 11 hcuso brcnJ.dn,l' o.nd is l.i.a;.,lu to i.n1Jriocnnent fer four- .• t teen years. If the offence is ocnr.1itte..l in thu ni.)lt, it is ternetl 11 b~laryll and the offencler ,is lia.'..,.le to in1:.risornc1ont for twonty yearso (enphaeis ie t1ino") - 3 Thor,:;; is no GVi1enco on rc~ord k show let alcno 1.,rovo that Nr. ;ictson or tui¥One else usucl tho cn.rc.vo.n, in the; w~)r(~s cf the: statute, 11 G.S a. human <..1:vtollin;·. II Mr. \~o.tson nncl his wife had a ~)uiL~in,s within }h$ pr"'r.1ls~s"·whlch they occupivd D.S o. dwcllinJ houso~ 1foit~,or dL. the :__.ruarcls dwell in tn0 ca.ro.vnn in th$ courso -.,f their ni3ht watch. On th(; o~he~ hand the ;;Yiclenc0 thc.t there is shows that that caravan :j.s ke;pt ~er lock anc.l key an.J. n0ro ;,r-01::-0.bly thnn not wn.s then ;)ein; uoocl a.s 0, roccptaclo. i~s · such it 1::0oe nc t quo.lify as a '.:,uilding for tho :pur-,t>0ses 0f th~ law unclar which tho npiJ~llont wo.s chni-3Gu in th~ first coun._, ·- . •~s rc.:;o.rda the second lssuo tho lonrn0,::. trial resident ua.i;istrato' s r.::.C.SoJ1in1:; ::;ristloe with 0lenonts r;f nisplacocl 1•lon cf iJrocf if nd whollY !ounc.ml ~,n ocnjeeturc. '.ec this end, \ikv ·he sai;.: I Jo net rulo (;\1t the :poesi- hility that the e,ffemlin,~ envolcpe niJht have been c.ro:vpeu in th0 caravan 'Jy ' . th.::: tl1)t,1cllant inaduertcntly in thr: cuuroo cf n, stealin,_;. Likowlso .there ia no Y,e.o.:Je,,n for axcludin_; thu ~ssi::ility th:.:i.t _it 1JiJht hn:-re ".>oon ;_)lantGd thci-G. ' Tol,kins r,f pussibili ties ther0 o.r.:::;; n th,,uannd ru1tl one reasons at1Y 0n0 ,;,f which ocn ox-,t>l.~in how thG incrir.1ino.tin,~ onvelol)G f,:.;unu its way i.e. tho caravan. For thes(;:: r011sons, I on at Jno with Hr. Waryu:·a l.;iarneG Stt.te ,~ttorney whon he su"..;r1i'ttetl that th~ 9vi•.:'..~nco is rn.thor scanty .s if n0t shnJJ.ow tc found tho :111~0llant' a convicticn, ln tho upsh0t this a:p:Jon.l is o.llc,wud~ ~<:: ~1i:;;,c-llant's conviction is qua.shod o.nl he, should bo rdeaoo.;l fr,)r.1 ;irison !orthwi th unless ho '.:)e ·1101d thoro fer oc:1.:l cthor lawful coUl!>t. 'l'-~· _,..M/ . W•:d • .J • Kn.p.::;yn., PRM • ..:bet. Jurfr,.l.i..cti.on 12/9/95 i.clivero:l in chno:-e~s this 12th doy of S.;,~t, r.:i·:)cr 1 1995 in tl-w pr"l;i8"1Il,C~ ct Mr. Munuc h:D.rnc.:.l Stat~ ~..ttor11ey nnd in the n,';)s<.lnCG of the 3.l)~llc.nt. \)t..<L-\.--,.-4--.,./ W.H.D. Ko.:;;>o.Yn.r / . ?RM. i!Jxt. Ju.riff1 -:.c ti0n 0 12/9/9~ .~T SOHc:@J~ 12th S0ptiii:11:ier, 1995