kassim mwinshehe mayoli vs dar es salaam water sewarage authority and 3 others 2023 tzhc 17568 31 may 2023

kassim mwinshehe mayoli vs dar es salaam water sewarage authority and 3 others 2023 tzhc 17568 31 may 2023

Allegation of denial of right to be heard, amounting to illegality, has been specifically pleaded and constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for leave for judicial review.

Citation
kassim mwinshehe mayoli vs dar es salaam water sewarage authority and 3 others 2023 tzhc 17568 31 may 2023
Parties
Applicant: Kassim Mwinshehe Mayoli; 1st Respondent: Dar es Salaam Water and Sewerage Authority; 2nd Respondent: Public Service Commission; 3rd Respondent: The President of United Republic of Tanzania; 4th Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
31 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Right to Be Heard, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Limitation Period
Source Language
English
Administrative Law Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Judicial Review Right to Be Heard Illegality as Ground for Extension Limitation Period

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kassim Mwinshehe Mayoli

Applicant

Dar es Salaam Water and Sewerage Authority

1st Respondent

Public Service Commission

2nd Respondent

The President of United Republic of Tanzania

3rd Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has adduced sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for leave for judicial review
  2. 2 Whether denial of right to be heard constitutes sufficient ground for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Allegation of denial of right to be heard, amounting to illegality, has been specifically pleaded and constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for leave for judicial review.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted thirty (30) days to file application for leave for judicial review
  • No order as to costs