kastan mining plc vs tanzania mortgage co ltd ta t mortgage another 2019 tzhc 218 23 december 2019

kastan mining plc vs tanzania mortgage co ltd ta t mortgage another 2019 tzhc 218 23 december 2019

The suit is not barred by res judicata as the causes of action and claims differ, but procedural defects including expired speed truck and uncertainty regarding the relief sought render the suit improperly framed and impossible to execute; therefore, the suit must be struck out.

Citation
kastan mining plc vs tanzania mortgage co ltd ta t mortgage another 2019 tzhc 218 23 december 2019
Parties
Plaintiff: Kastan Mining PLC; 1st Defendant: Tanzania Mortgage Company Ltd t/a T-Mortgage; 2nd Defendant: Kaisi Kalambo
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
23 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Procedural Defects
Outcome
suit struck out
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Jurisdiction, Specific Performance, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kastan Mining PLC

Plaintiff

Tanzania Mortgage Company Ltd t/a T-Mortgage

1st Defendant

Kaisi Kalambo

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Procedural Defects

  1. 1 Whether the suit is barred by res judicata
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction given prior decisions
  3. 3 Whether the relief sought is possible given the status of the title deed

Ratio Decidendi

The suit is not barred by res judicata as the causes of action and claims differ, but procedural defects including expired speed truck and uncertainty regarding the relief sought render the suit improperly framed and impossible to execute; therefore, the suit must be struck out.

Court Disposition

suit struck out

Orders

  • Suit struck out with no order as to costs.
  • Plaintiff at liberty to re-file the suit after addressing procedural and substantive defects.