20170822 TZHC Mwanza2

20170822 TZHC Mwanza2

The appellant lacked locus standi to institute the proceedings as he neither established himself as the sole heir nor produced letters of administration or authority from other heirs. As a result, the proceedings and decisions of the tribunals below were nullified and set aside.

Citation
20170822 TZHC Mwanza2
Parties
Appellant: Kekora Masoka; Respondent: Robert Machine
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
22 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of locus standi; proceedings and decisions below quashed and set aside.
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Administration of Estates, Land Allocation, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kekora Masoka

Appellant

Robert Machine

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant had locus standi to institute the land dispute
  2. 2 Whether the appellate tribunal erred in reversing the trial tribunal's decision
  3. 3 Whether the appellate tribunal properly evaluated the evidence and gave reasons for departing from assessors' opinions

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant lacked locus standi to institute the proceedings as he neither established himself as the sole heir nor produced letters of administration or authority from other heirs. As a result, the proceedings and decisions of the tribunals below were nullified and set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of locus standi; proceedings and decisions below quashed and set aside.

Orders

  • Proceedings and decisions of the Ward Tribunal and District Land and Housing Tribunal for Mara at Musoma are quashed and set aside.
  • Appellant is at liberty to re-file subject to obtaining proper authority and compliance with limitation laws.