gihana and others v republic of rwanda order application 0172015 2016 afchpr 64 3 june 2016

gihana and others v republic of rwanda order application 0172015 2016 afchpr 64 3 june 2016

The withdrawal of Rwanda's declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not suspend or affect the examination of applications already filed before the African Court prior to the withdrawal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
gihana and others v republic of rwanda order application 0172015 2016 afchpr 64 3 june 2016
Parties
Applicant: Kennedy Gihana and others; Respondent: Republic of Rwanda
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
3 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Order on Effect of Withdrawal of Declaration Under Article 34(6) of the Protocol
Outcome
Application to suspend proceedings rejected; proceedings to continue.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of African Court, Withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration, Suspension of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Human Rights Law International Law Jurisdiction of African Court Withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration Suspension of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Gihana and others

Applicant

Republic of Rwanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory Order on Effect of Withdrawal of Declaration Under Article 34(6) of the Protocol

  1. 1 Whether the withdrawal of Rwanda's declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol suspends or affects pending proceedings against Rwanda before the African Court

Ratio Decidendi

The withdrawal of Rwanda's declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not suspend or affect the examination of applications already filed before the African Court prior to the withdrawal.

Court Disposition

Application to suspend proceedings rejected; proceedings to continue.

Orders

  • The Court unanimously decides to continue examining the Application.