khalfan nasoro ruhombo vs mohamedi hassani and 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 822 20 september 2021

khalfan nasoro ruhombo vs mohamedi hassani and 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 822 20 september 2021

The applicant failed to provide substantiated evidence for his illness and did not specify when he became aware of the proceedings, thus failed to account for each day of delay. The reasons advanced were unsubstantiated and unreliable, and the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Citation
khalfan nasoro ruhombo vs mohamedi hassani and 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 822 20 september 2021
Parties
Applicant: Khalfan Nassoro Ruhombo; 1st Respondent: Mohamedi Hassan; 2nd Respondent: Salehe Khalfan Ruhombo; 3rd Respondent: Selemani Khalfan Ruhombo
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 September 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Sufficient Cause, Proof of Illness, Delay in Filing, Non Party to Proceedings
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Sufficient Cause Proof of Illness Delay in Filing Non Party to Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khalfan Nassoro Ruhombo

Applicant

Mohamedi Hassan

1st Respondent

Salehe Khalfan Ruhombo

2nd Respondent

Selemani Khalfan Ruhombo

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision out of time against the decision of the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Kibaha

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide substantiated evidence for his illness and did not specify when he became aware of the proceedings, thus failed to account for each day of delay. The reasons advanced were unsubstantiated and unreliable, and the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs