khalid mwisongo vs ms unitrans t ltd 2018 tzhcld 3 2 february 2018
The applicant's reasons for recusal do not meet the legal threshold established by binding precedent; no evidence of bias, improper relationship, or interest exists, and procedural complaints are unfounded.
- Citation
- khalid mwisongo vs ms unitrans t ltd 2018 tzhcld 3 2 february 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Khalid Mwisongo; Respondent: M/S Unitrans (T) Ltd
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Recusal Application
- Outcome
- Application for recusal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Recusal of Judge, Extension of Time, Notice of Representation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khalid Mwisongo
Applicant
M/S Unitrans (T) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Recusal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the presiding judge should recuse herself from hearing the application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's reasons for recusal do not meet the legal threshold established by binding precedent; no evidence of bias, improper relationship, or interest exists, and procedural complaints are unfounded.
Court Disposition
Application for recusal dismissed
Orders
- Hearing of the application to proceed on merit
- Respondent to serve applicant with counter affidavit in court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment