khalifa ramadhani vs republic 2013 tzca 359 23 september 2013
The extra judicial statement was voluntarily made and properly admitted in evidence; the conviction was therefore proper.
- Citation
- khalifa ramadhani vs republic 2013 tzca 359 23 september 2013
- Parties
- Appellant: Khalifa Ramadhani; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Armed Robbery, Confession Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Voluntariness of Confession
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Khalifa Ramadhani
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's conviction based on an extra judicial confession was proper
- 2 Whether the extra judicial statement was properly admitted in evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The extra judicial statement was voluntarily made and properly admitted in evidence; the conviction was therefore proper.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed in its entirety
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment