Kidahadi Ilunda Vs
The applicant failed to establish sufficient cause for extension of time, as the alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record and the reasons for delay were unsupported and insufficient. The application was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- Kidahadi Ilunda Vs
- Parties
- Applicant: Kidahadi Ilunda; 1st Respondent: Verediana Herman; 2nd Respondent: Izidomini Herman
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Locus Standi, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Appeals Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kidahadi Ilunda
Applicant
Verediana Herman
1st Respondent
Izidomini Herman
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause exists to grant extension of time to file an appeal
- 2 Whether alleged illegality (lack of locus standi) constitutes good cause for extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish sufficient cause for extension of time, as the alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record and the reasons for delay were unsupported and insufficient. The application was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment