kimei said vs rose malinga 2018 tzhclandd 149 4 may 2018
The application was filed almost nine years after the decision, far beyond the fourteen-day limit prescribed by law, making it time barred.
- Citation
- kimei said vs rose malinga 2018 tzhclandd 149 4 may 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Kimei Said; Respondent: Rose Malinga
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Time Bar, Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Kimei Said
Applicant
Rose Malinga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed almost nine years after the decision, far beyond the fourteen-day limit prescribed by law, making it time barred.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- application struck out with costs for being time barred
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment