kisha companies tanzania ltd vs tha another 2005 tzhc 87 15 december 2005

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE N0.75 OF 2004 KISHA COMPANIES TANZANIA LTD .........PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1.T.H. A ..............................................DEFENDANTS 2. PSRC RULING A.Shangwa,J. In this case, the 2nd defendant PSRC has raised a preliminary objection that there is no legal basis for joining it in the suit. Learned counsel for both parties have submitted at length concerning this preliminary objection. Personally, I am going to be very very brief in my ruling on this preliminary objection because it is not for the first time that the 2nd defendant is raising a similar point of objection . All similar objections which were previously raised by the 2nd defendant were dismissed by the C o u rt. The Court did so by relying on the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966 namely 0.1.r.3. 0.1 r.3 of the said code settles the question as to who may be joined as defendants. It provides as follows: "r.3 all persons may be joined as defendants against whom any right to relief in respect of or arising out of the same act or transaction or series of acts or transactions is alleged to exist, whether jointly, severally or in the alternative, where if separate suits were brought against such persons any common question of law or fact would arise". In this matter, as the 1st defendant THA is under the official receivership of the 2nd defendant, the plaintiff do expect to get relief from the 2nd defendant if its claim against the 1st defendant will succeed. The legal basis for 3 joining the 2nd defendant lies in the fact that it is the official receiver of the 1st defendant against whom the plaintiff has lodged its claim. 0.1 r.5 of the same code settles the question as to whether or not in order to be joined in the suit, the defendant need be interested in it. Under this rule, it is provided that, it shall not be necessary that every defendant shall be interested as to all the reliefs claimed in any suit against him. Therefore, in this particular case, for being joined in the suit, it was not necessary that the 2nd defendant should be interested in the reliefs claimed by the plaintiff. 4 For these reasons, I dismiss this preliminary objection with costs to the plaintiff. fcr-v— A.Shangwa, 3. 15/12/2005 Delivered in open Court this 15th day of December, 2005. A. Shangwa JUDGE 15/12/2005