19861111 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The appeal was misconceived as it was filed in the wrong forum; it should have been preferred to the Housing Appeals Tribunal, not the High Court.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19861111 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Kissili Silvuly; Respondent: S. Said Imlulakfi
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Appeals Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kissili Silvuly
Appellant
S. Said Imlulakfi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was properly filed before the High Court instead of the Housing Appeals Tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was misconceived as it was filed in the wrong forum; it should have been preferred to the Housing Appeals Tribunal, not the High Court.
Court Disposition
Dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
: T.;CBi:J.11..NEOUS CIVIL .~PPEAL NO. 27 OF 1986 K.:i.SS IllI STii.JV113ULY •••••••• • •••••••••••••••••••••••• ~·.PJ?EIC,\NT versus S.1.':i.IDI I~~L'~:'°J}L.~Kfi •• o • o o • • • • • • o o . o o • • • o o "'., o . CJ o., o • • • iLGSI1ONDENT R.H.'.'l'I J ~ This is f.1.n ap::_:onl f1,om tho decision of' tho De,r es Salaam Regfonal Housinc Tribunc·.l. .~ccorcli.nc:; to section -~l of Rent Restriction :.ct lT 0 .l 7 o:f 190<- ';;hich co.mo j_nto effect on 7/6/35, APP@l?.-!S froL1 the decision of the·Rocionnl Housine; Trib~ls ·' go to tho Housinc .'i.p;1e~\l.-., '.i:riburu:.11"" ·.:,:a.d accordin[§ to section 43 of the ,J~'.tlO .'.ct ::•.:x)oc:lD cletl:rr.1ine1!l by the ,\ppeals Tribuna.l, the decision 01' dctorr:i.in;.'.tion by such 'J:ribunnl shall be final nnd conclusive 1 l\i:'OViC:'.Gd tl,o.t :::i.n ctpponl from any other decision or deterr.1in,'.tion of the ;,~)penls T:citunnl shall lie to the High Court upon eny )oint of law or miXed facts and law. It follows ::':ro:.1 tho above that this appeal is misconceived because it should have been preferred to the HousinB Appeals Tribunal. It is there- fore disrn.isFJcc.1 wj_th c,):Jts~ ,- ........... . .,~ ... .,,,...•· ... -·· JtIDGE Court: Juc1r_911ent deliv0l'od i11 co1.,1.rt on 11th November, 1986. ,., ,,,-: . .k-;-;'h......., Jtr:::·cm DAil J~S fLL:.~·"rn 11th 1-JO\T.i:.I;n~m, 1906 \