19881223 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The appellant was found in possession of a motor vehicle that had been violently stolen from the complainant. The registration numbers on the vehicle had been tampered with, and the appellant admitted to regularly parking the vehicle at the location where it was seized. The trial magistrate properly convicted the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19881223 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Kitwun Balum; Respondent: The United Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Stolen Property, Robbery With Violence, Evidence Evaluation, Sentencing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kitwun Balum
Appellant
The United Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly convicted of being in possession of property reasonably suspected to have been unlawfully acquired under section 312 of the Penal Code
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved the appellant knew or had reason to know the property was stolen
- 3 Whether the trial magistrate erred in evaluating the evidence regarding the registration numbers and possession
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was found in possession of a motor vehicle that had been violently stolen from the complainant. The registration numbers on the vehicle had been tampered with, and the appellant admitted to regularly parking the vehicle at the location where it was seized. The trial magistrate properly convicted the appellant of being in possession of property reasonably suspected to have been unlawfully acquired, as the prosecution established the necessary elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence affirmed
- appellant to remain in custody
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
.h.rr.1'.JLL.1-,.'l'.c.; JUrtlb.i.JlCTIL;N tiiGtl CvUn'.1' Ci,il·1J.llihL h.l:'.C .u.hL r11.., .102/00 vuIGIN.1-,.L C~lMl~hL C~0~ hu. 233 vY 1~07 .. . v:F .CM .LJIB'r~\J.l,'l' Cvlil"\T vF 11,-,11-1. 1.,L::,'l'hlCT 1-1.'J.1 l\.L::i U'l1U .ul.JFv~,l; 1'" o .ti. o CHILLGNJI .d::, '--(,o 1 L;D;:_, l.i.,.6h'l' hhG lb ·l'hr.T L KITv;;-i..Nll.. ~.1-,.LUh ••••••••••••••••••••••• hrrtLL1-d~'l.1 (0riLinD.l .1-,.ccused) versus 'l'ii._c; UNIT~0 1t.r:..t'U.rJLIC •••••••••••••• l,.t..::i.PGN1,1:;NT (vriLim,l .l:'rusec_ut or) .,. J U JJ G M .i!; N T t· The a~~ellant, Kitwun~ b&lum, w~s chciLed with six cth~rs with "- the of~ence ,,f rvb,,(:;ry with vi0l-=nCE: c/s 205 ...:nd 2u6 uf the renal r,,_-.~8 in the JJistrict Cuurt vf llalu "'t Kisutu, LJar es S&l~~m. They were 11 ~lsc chcr~e~ with Unl~Lfully blterinc ~nu QffixinL iuentific~ti~n m-rks 0n a _mut0r vehicle c/~ 11(4)(a) ~nd ll(b) of the Tr&ffic 1-1.ct hv.30 uf 1~73 ■ ~he Le~rned llBSiuent MaListr&te fuun~ ~s u f~ct th~t the cum~lain~nt, rllnur Hu0u.a, th~ owner of the mutor vehicle reListr-tiun ~o.tZ 7409t·w&s on 2~th July, 1~06 at abuut 2G - 30 hl.-urs violently, ctnu .... t 1_,un i.,oint, ro"Gbed of the s&iu mote,r vehicle. li.owevt::r;· he wc..:s not satisfieu. un the ev.iuence e.<.luuced by -t,he 1,rose- cutiun thc..t the a}J1-,ellnnt :.,..n~- h:i ·"' r-,) -.'l,1"'<•11.~,.,,1 h,ok p,-,rt in the violent · a.s;;,cJ.ult 0n the crnn11lA-in,-n.i:., tcnLl. ~s a result be. ::t.tc½.uitted. them :.::.11 on the rohLery charGe ■ tie alsu ac4uitted. all the accused and the a~pe- 1~ant on the seconJ count. The av~ellant, however wus fuund suilty uf beinL found in poibession of ~ruperty un~er sectuiun 312 bf the ~enal Goae and w2s as a result sentenced t0 seven years imprisonm~nt. 'l'he alJJ:.,~lls.nt, Jiss"'tisfied with the cunviction ancl sentence, . has ap:[.,ealed tu this court at;a_inst the cc:nvictie,n and sentenceo He set • up 12 cruunus of a~ 1 eal .i~ his memorandum ot appedl but all exc~pt tvc are ex~ressin~ the same ~uint. I have propusecl to tle&l with the only two whith, in my openiun, are relevant fur c~nsiderbtiun and decisiun, ~nu l append them hereun~er:- 1. ~hat the learned trial·md~istrate had erred in law and fact in tak.ine; into account ancl believine, th~-t the uis~mtE:-_. car alle~edly fuun~ in the possessiun uf the appellant bore a fctlse rebistr~t10n number rz 70336, whereus on record, ~t wi;,..s nut i-iruved tu thc..et effe·ct ii:i view of the fi:A.ct th&t 0n j t.s prctiuctiun in cuurt a~ exhibit ~-7 the s&me tore re~istrgt~~r number~~ 74L~6. - C. - beca~se the essence ·to ce,nvict an ~ccusea ~ur&un on this offence, the ~r0s~cuti0n 0½Lht t0 h&ve adduced evidence. th~t the person ch~rGed knew ur h~d the reuson to know th&t the pror,urty he :,,u i:,0ssessed Wc-.S c.1. st0len on(:;, &n 1;lement which was ~0t ~roved amun~ uth~r ~lements in this case. ~n he~rint the appe~l, th~ appellant a~ie~r&d in persun, wh\:;reLs the nepuGlic w~s represented by the le-rn0d bt~te gtturney, Mr. Kolli~ye. rtlthuu~h th0 ap~eliant s~itl h0 ditl nut h~ve mure ~oints to s&y ½~si~0 □ his L,re,unu.s 0n his ni1:;mur<-.nuum of 8.}/eei..,l ht::, h0i1.c:ver insisted th- t ~>- :. ,; "'llow._a tu cl..irify his st.:.:-t"'ments of ur,1,eu.L, he stc:. . rte<J. by tclliri:_:. : __ i,, ccurt th-t th<:: evitlenc~ at the lower court ~~s ~urely ~ fi~we up ir:. the lliCtor vehicle peuLeut 504, ~~ 70336 w~s very well kn0wn tu him L.r:.c. it Gel0n~ctl tu une Hnth0ny ~utric. ~h~t it w~s thd ~~~ellunt wh0 t,r0ue,ht it t0 the: pu.rkinL i,L.,:.c...: whc-r1:: th8 1,...,lice fuuncl "'nu s·ei_z1:;..:l it. ~he i,arkinb ~luce w~s c hiu~en pluGa but w~s ~ comruon pvrkin~ ~l&c~ where gny une brincinb his c~r there t0 ~~rk CGulu see the s~i~ u0tLr- vehicle. 1'he alJkellunt further stated he, ~einG a mutor mdchanic, his frienu .l:'c..tric ap:i.-ro~·cht:tl the al,J}.;eliant o.n1.,. i:J.skeu him if he cuull,.. stlc.w him (.!:'cttric) a plt,ce where he c uuh; s.:..fely pL,rk his motor vehicle E,r; .J:'atric wus G0inL on sufuri to arush~. ~he appellant broucht ~/:J.tric t0 ~ ~~.b, balim hult~n, the watchman of that place where the st0len car wc.,,S f0unu 1,,&rk0Ja 1'he wc.tchmo.n, .:iccorclinc tu the Clp}Jellant, ae-.-r8e•_'. t t&ke Ci....re of thc car c,t l., }!rice uf ;:,hs. ·30/= JJer d.0..y. 1'he a[Jl,i;llc:.nt h~vint said this ccntenu.ed th&t the ~r0secutiun contr~dicteQ itself when they u.lleLed thut 'the motor vehicle o.t the scene bore re~,istrc:.ti;,);_ number T~ 70336, whereas when the c&r wus tt:ntleretl in court as exhiLit 1 the rcListr~tion numbers on.the nun~cr pl~tes were TZ 74~96. The uriLin.::i.l nur.n.,ers c..,n the insur.-:,,nce sticker, u.ccoru.inb to the -&ppel'. E.r:t '. vp1,11::~reJ tu huve b0en rul.Jlieu uff anu thtreon in.stc~.u nuwb,/r.s 'l'Zi 7u3_";,( were superimposed. 'rhe trial 1i,'--L.istrc.:..te, therefore, the ap1,e1lant s::i<.. ' uoubted th~t pi~c0 0f ~viJence esi,0ciully when the n_me on the inbur,nct sticker w-s fcunc. tc be th.-...t of .i:ih:....rif, th0 secu!a.i ,:;..C(,USe:'i l..t tht; tr1:.l, ~nu in effect he (2nJ accUbbtl) w.-...s ~c~uittetl. In view uf such douLt, the C,1..t-'iellD.nt cuntcnuett, the ~rcst::c;utiun <liu n0t hi..,Ve l.. c0ncrete ~n--:. sclic.. eviuence l.:.nC.: ~-s such the tri~l mc.-.r.istr"'te w'-'-s wronL to convict the Lq,;r,elL:,nt ur, the b . . . sis that the robl.ie;cl cL.r Wi.. s fvllnu. in the hE".nc:s of the ~~~ellant. It w~s ~lso the crLument 0f the up~ellant th~t tte; lectrned trial m&Gistr~te failou tc ev~lu~te the appellunt's evic..ence, fc,r, huu. he uune sc; ~1.e 11rnulu huve rec:.lisetl th<--t the prosecution f~ilc'..:'. tu reGut the eviuence _0f the i~tellant especi.-...lly when he pointe~ uut thut he he..(.,;, inf0rrneG. the lJolice thu.t the uwnc:r of the u.isputetl car t0 11 i·,uiDui Guest H.0use 11 ut !vJw::,;,n[,DYc.tf,,~L: where the culprit - .l:'[..tric h~u 101.-L.eu Lefvrto 10<-,vint, fur I.rusho.. ·i·h<.,..t, c.-lthoul_,h pvlice ccnfinL,. irun the J..iuibui Guest B.e,u,se thc).t _:..,ne 1-'c,.tric he.tu. lou.t;e<..,, there ancl h&~ Finc..lly 1 L . . ft - 3 - the o.h•el i.Hlt st&tt::11 thc..t the ulJ.cvtiGnS 'uy the: :rolice ~hc..t he \/&S the e,n<:: whu "'ltereJ. u.nc.; fc.. lsific:L£ the nui,,bers fr0m T:6 74L76 tu rE:ac'. Tz, 7U33b were n0t .t,1IOV(:;J us,- tht:.:re Wi;,.,S no such eviu,enc~ to 1,,r0ve t.h;_,,.t he WuS the ~ne whu ~efused the numbers un the: insurunce stickE:;r ~~~ then technically supp~rimposeJ faked~n~mb(:;rs;.~n~.Eecondly tL~t ~pl.rt from the insurunce sticker, the numb~rs on the cbr plbtes pruduc~~ tu the: c0urt tot0eth1::r with the vehicle were t.l:H:: uriLinal unes, ne,,,.r,10ly, TZ 74~9b. ~he appellant theref0re ~ruy~ th~t his ap~e~l be all0~od, the cGnviction abuinst him ~u~shetl ~nd the sentence thereof set ~siCe. v.nu cunse¼uently thefefore he be rc:leased. ~h~ short.hi$tGry 0f th<:: c~~~ us correctly restated by.the leclrne~ ~t~te Att0rnc:y, Mr. Komeye, i~ ·th~t the a~pellant wit~ six. others, exclu~inG une ~atric hnthony antl 2nLther ~0rsun by the name uf .uv.kv.ri wh(DJ]1 the c.:.pr,ellant is cL:..irnini_" were the G\-.rners of the stclen vehicle, were cho.rietl with the ofit:.:nce 9f roL~ery• with vicl0nce c/s 2t5 ~ne,; 2b6 uf the ~enal Coue. rhey were nlso ch~rtc:u on the sea0n~ c0unt with unliwfully ulterin~ bnt c:,.ffixinc iuenti1ication rnbrks un & motor vehicle c/s 11(4)(&) ~f tte ~r~ffic hct, ~a. 30 of 1973. The ~rosecution fLlileJ. tu establish tbEt the appellant and his co- o.ccusetl ~i~ rub the SLliu mut0r vehicle at tun point. The leLrned rt~Eiuent Na~istrate ~lsu fuun~ them not tuilty on the s~c0nJ count. hcwever; the triul flk;.t...,istr.:..te fuun~ the 1:tflkl &nt e,uilty of bein 1~ in posBession or h~vinL contrGl of a pro1>~rty which w'-"s ruason&bly sus- pcctcu to huVE:: Leen ob±ainecl or unla~Jfully r. . c'-.luired. 1-1lthouLh the · cumil'-"in~n~ fail~~ tu iuentify his ass~il~nts who robLe~ him of the s~iu motor vehicle, the f~ct still remi:..i~s thu.t he w&s rob-eel of his motor vehicle at ~un point. The a~~ellant was cunvicted of unlcwfully i,;osoes&ion c-:n'-' Wc-S sentt=nc0u tu seven ye~-rs imi,risonmcnt rer,a.r{l ~1u.vint, Lieen l,iven to the nJi:,,nn(:;r the 1nutor vt.::lncl<:: w<.ts tc.ken frun th.;; c0mpl~inu.nt ~w.3. ~his motor vehicle wus stolen un 2~th July, ljLG u.nu rvi .3 rel'orted the rctuery to the police,. vn 9th Septemt0r, lS,•0G l,,~ .1 w"'s ti1,>pecl th...,.t · the rob bell rn0tor veh-icle w:.,s seein1__ tlriven ci:ii,l:y i:..nu uruu 11t to a co.r J:.iUrk "'-t the flc::.ts nc~;r Fi.re i.Jr.i[~&J.e premises an:~ • C, th~t the numbers on the motor vehicle pl~te &ppe~red fak\d., th~t is1 ~~ 7033b. h police teum consistinL of ~w.l, ~w.4 anu ~w.6 went in ~ursuit 0f the rnot0r vehicle~ ihey s~w the s~iu motor vehicle. Gn th&t s&me ~uy the &ppellant ~~sin the house of ~W~9 who is the resiu.ent ·of the flats l.,uiL. . inG ·uf the N0tic.,n"'l i1uusint _Curi.,orL:.ti.on • .'fhe tri~l cour.t 1:1c;.s tc,lu Ly th0 pc•lice witnesses tha.t wh0n the ·C,Vice- ll~rit c~me frum the hcuse of t'W.~ he S&W one 0f the police ctetecti~c~ whcm he knew ~uite well, anu se~int this, the nppell~nt· <.leci~ed to uivc::rt. h_oweve.r, as the pulice huJ. be<:::n tipi:,ec; t'hc...t the appellc.nt w'-"s 'the 0ne wh0 usc:c:. tc., Lrint., the motor vehicle uncl }_.)e,,.rkE:<.l it thE:r0, ..::eciueu t0 fol1ow thE: ai,1-,ellc:..nt cin,:,_ ::.0t him in b hcuse belun,·in~, t:.., -- . _.... - ._·. - 4 - investit., .... t(ju th;:; Cc.Se .uisc0ver2u th--,t tlH.: insur'-'-nce stiaker wD.s ot tc'mpereu with Ly hc.,vinGLruLLed off. 'l'hc cor,1i-,L"'inc.. nt, · .t'l/1 .3, vn:s c..,..l~•-C.., he l,rvu1.:,r1t his r0l,isbi..-tivn cc:...rc. anu the insur.:..nce clvcum"nts. '.Lh;_; r"--t.,istr'-tion c&rc:. Wi..-S r1;o .... c:.in1.:S' 1 TL>740S16 11 • 'l'he _nurnters cm the encine c,n .. -c~~sis tbllied with thos~ i-,rescribed.0n the reListi·.tiun c~rtl ~nf insurunce cover. These ~Gcumc'nts were tentl~reG ~n~ ~umitted in Cvurt i..-S exhi0it ~-5 2n~ ~.6 respectively. The nuruLer ~lc..tes on the veh1clu wherr seized Ly the pulice at the fire fl&ts re~~ ~Z 70336. ~s the numbers on the chasis ~nu en~ine of thut·motor vehicle t&l~ied with those shvwn on the insurance cover &nJ r"'bis1ri..-tion c~rd, automatically it Wc.1.ScP.<llc::t.u'-'eci thc.t the motor vehicle in ...,uestie,n wcs the 0!1e ruLi..,ed_ -.f fr0m ~n-3 unJe~ cun point, where~s the numbers on the i-,1'-'-tes wh~n seiz~G uy the ~vlice were f~ku4~ 0nes. The' sn'-L th,.;...t dfveloped wus tt1ut ·wlnle th1:: c~lse w,.;...s still penJ.inc, in cvurt th<:: :r,;clice r . ,turned the m0tor vehicle to J:'vv.3. 'l'he. f:_J~@J). _.. 1,l,__te nurr1b(,rs wr~re r,,mov,-,cl frc,rn the mtitor v~hicle and the i-,rupcr ones uffix~~ t0 enable the com~l&J~ant, ~w.3, to use the mutor vehicle, the cuse in c0urt not withst~ndinL- 'rhe fc.,,_.::kfe . d-' pl...:.te num1J~rs were £;.lsG tenllcred in court i:,.S exhiLit 1:'o~o the motur vehicle' with its neal numbers wus tc'naerea us exhi~it ~-i- ~w.9 whu is tne a~pell~nt's friend tulJ the court th~t he w~s the one who intr0uuced the OfJ_.,ellant to the w...:.tchm-n (~w.b) to allow him p~rk the c0.r there • It wus the eviuent1:: of ~Wo0 th&t the uppell&nt We,.~ .r·rcm the clLvve f ....,cts, there vi..:,s therefc.re stronc evi(-'.ence from flJ,, b "'"nu rrio9 thc:...t th<:; a1;i:,ellc..nt "was in the lJOSsessicJn of the vi·olently rc,:.,,.,e~ motor v1::hicle. '.l.'he learned ~ksiclent J.vl'-'-t;istru.te, no J.oubt, wus riLht when he fvun~ the appell~nt not tuilty uf rol:.,~ery &t tun point as ( the eviuence l.::;.ckeu sup1-1ort of -thE:: ch""re-e, thc,. t is offence no-t 1-,roven , (~lthoµLh he miGht have comraitted the offence). hs there w&s no eviu.ence to i,rove th...:.t the E:.lJl.eLant w~s ]_.,resent &t or ,durint, the rouLery &t ~un point, it c~n Sbfely be st~tea th&t the leurned triul i'letc,istr .... te :J,!rOp8rly convicteC::. the nppell"'-nt of the &.lt,·rnc.-t:i.ve convictio1: for ~eint. fuunti in possession vf stolen l-1roi,erty. This f~ct is- furth~r uem0nstr-teti by the ai-,~ellant's own u~ruission ~t pci~e 25 of the ~roces- uinL_s wnen he t olu the trie..l court thc-t .he Wc.,..S the on<:: who wus uh1c..ys ~~rkinG the mot0r vehicle gt the pl~ce the police f0unct it. The tri&l m.:..Listr~te corrdctly 0bserv<::tl from the c'Viuence~ that the np~ellant h~~ ~amitted th"'"t the finLcr print impressiuns faun~ on the b0~y of th~ car t.;y the fintyr print E::Xpert were those of the ai.,i,,ell_nnt o 'l'her6' w&s therefore only cme ½.uesti0n ...:.t the triul, &nG. on my·-i-,art in this appe~l, 1 muint~in th~ s~me '1.uestion, ~nu th~t is, whether the upp0l~~ct - 5 - who W,c,.S ... undoubtc::lJ.ly . '! fcnin,!'.., jn. p0;R~.r.aR.inu uf tJ,,,,. ,.:c•mpl, ..in,·.nt. 1 :-: v_.:,r,ir-li:, . :. . ' . . . ., , , w~s uni of the armetl robbers. hS it hus been J:.,Ointetl out above that ~ue~ti0n was faun~ in the neiutive by the triul court antl as I have· s&iu th~t wus a correct finGinL• Frum what I huve s~itl above I ~m Scttisfied b(;;yuncl scintillu of Joubt th::..t. this o.j,.,i. e..:.tl is with-cut mer:_: unu therc::furt: it must fu.il. 'l'he O.J:.,1,eu.l is . <.lismis, dcl in its ent ir\::t/ ._ 'l'he sentence is fair o.r1ll just in view of the nc:. ture u.l'.!J circumstonc<..- ,; uf th~ c~~e~ and ~u r·hu.ve no re~sun to interf~re with the sent(::nc0~ _iav~-,e-...._.- Co 'JVf 1-.i;f✓i;., - 1-'i~Ivi .t-l o EXTENi.,i!;i.r J'U.t,fo1.1IC'l1 luN 23 - 12 ~ l<;;ud J~~ 6 ment delivered at 1.1ar es bal&u.m 23rJ 1.1ecember, 190b. h~~ellctnt - present in person Mr. Kyuki - for ·the hepublic _present. 1.,A h .b /j .S.i-1.L,1.11.lYJ. 23r~ 1.Jecember 2 19G0 ( ' J