19990111 TZHC Arusha
The suit was not a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 as the number of interested parties was not 'numerous' and the applicant did not purport to represent others; non-joinder of parties is not fatal and is curable; the trial court erred in dismissing the suit on these grounds.
- Citation
- 19990111 TZHC Arusha
- Parties
- Applicant: Kore Sung'are; Respondent: Dsyo1eyo
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appellate Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Representative Suits, Relator Suits, Joinder of Parties, Order 1 Rule 8 Civil Procedure Code, Order 1 Rule 9 Civil Procedure Code, Order 1 Rule 10 Civil Procedure Code
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kore Sung'are
Applicant
Dsyo1eyo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appellate Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit was a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966
- 2 Whether the trial court erred in treating a relator suit and a representative suit as synonymous
- 3 Whether non-joinder of plaintiffs was fatal to the suit
Ratio Decidendi
The suit was not a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 as the number of interested parties was not 'numerous' and the applicant did not purport to represent others; non-joinder of parties is not fatal and is curable; the trial court erred in dismissing the suit on these grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs
Orders
- Trial court's dismissal of the suit set aside
- Applicant permitted to proceed with the suit; non-joinder is curable
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment