19990111 TZHC Arusha

19990111 TZHC Arusha

The suit was not a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 as the number of interested parties was not 'numerous' and the applicant did not purport to represent others; non-joinder of parties is not fatal and is curable; the trial court erred in dismissing the suit on these grounds.

Citation
19990111 TZHC Arusha
Parties
Applicant: Kore Sung'are; Respondent: Dsyo1eyo
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 January 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appellate Ruling
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs
Legal Topics
Representative Suits, Relator Suits, Joinder of Parties, Order 1 Rule 8 Civil Procedure Code, Order 1 Rule 9 Civil Procedure Code, Order 1 Rule 10 Civil Procedure Code
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kore Sung'are

Applicant

Dsyo1eyo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appellate Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the suit was a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in treating a relator suit and a representative suit as synonymous
  3. 3 Whether non-joinder of plaintiffs was fatal to the suit

Ratio Decidendi

The suit was not a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 as the number of interested parties was not 'numerous' and the applicant did not purport to represent others; non-joinder of parties is not fatal and is curable; the trial court erred in dismissing the suit on these grounds.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs

Orders

  • Trial court's dismissal of the suit set aside
  • Applicant permitted to proceed with the suit; non-joinder is curable