Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

fory and others v republic of cote divoire 2021 afchpr 14 25 november 2021

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Only Kouadio Kobena Fory is the proper applicant as his wife and children are indirect or vicarious victims and do not have standing as applicants in this case.

Court disposition

Objection of Respondent State upheld; title of application amended to reflect sole applicant.

Orders

  • Finds that Kouadio Kobena Fory is the sole Applicant in the instant case.
  • Orders amendment of the title of the Application to 'Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire'.

02

Material facts

Parties

Kouadio Kobena Fory

Applicant Counsel: Self-represented

Republic of Cote d'Ivoire

Respondent Counsel: Ms LY Sangare, Nee Kadiatou, Judicial Officer of the Treasury

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Human Rights Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Change of Title and Standing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant claims violations of his and his family's rights due to his arrest, conviction, double detention, and related consequences.
Respondent
Respondent argues only Kouadio Kobena Fory has standing as applicant; his wife and children, being of legal age, must file on their own behalf.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Sebastien Germain Ajavon v. Republic of Benin, ACtHPR, Application No. 062/2019, Judgment (Merits) (4 December 2020), § 58

    Neither the Charter, nor the Protocol, nor the Rules require that the Applicant and the victim have to be the same; a person may act on behalf of others with their consent or authorization.

  2. 02

    Suy Bi Gohore Emile and others v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire, ACtHPR, Application No. 044/2019, Judgement of 15 July 2020 (Merits and Reparations), § 67; Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v. Republic of Rwanda, (Jurisdiction) (3 June 2016) 1 AfCLR 540 § 69

    Withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration does not affect pending cases or new cases filed before entry into force of withdrawal.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Only Kouadio Kobena Fory is the proper applicant as his wife and children are indirect or vicarious victims and do not have standing as applicants in this case.

Obiter and limits

  • The rights of the wife and children are closely related to the applicant's legal predicament but do not confer applicant status.

Court disposition

Objection of Respondent State upheld; title of application amended to reflect sole applicant.

  • Finds that Kouadio Kobena Fory is the sole Applicant in the instant case.
  • Orders amendment of the title of the Application to 'Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire'.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 25 November 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 25 November 2021

fory and others v republic of cote divoire 2021 afchpr 14 25 november 2021

AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE

UNIAO AFRICANA AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ET DES PEUPLES

THE MATTER OF KOUADIO KOBENA FORY, SPOUSE, SONS AND DAUGHTERS V. REPUBLIC OF COTE D'IVOIRE APPLICATION NO. 034 /2017

RULING (CHANGE OF TITLE OF APPLICATION) 25 NOVEMBER 2021 ~'., ~- .' --:. .,:} .) i. . // ;? The Court, composed of lmani D. ABOUD, President, Blaise TCHIKAYA, Vice- President, Ben KIOKO, Rafaa BEN ACHOUR, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Therese MUKAMULISA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Dumisa B. NTSEBEZA, Modibo SACKO - Judges; and Robert ENO. Registrar In the Matter of KOUADIO Kobena Fory, spouse, son and daughters Self-represented Versus REPUBLIC OF COTE D'IVOIRE Represented by: Ms LY Sangare, Nee Kadiatou, Judicial Officer of the Treasury After deliberation, renders the following Order: I. THE PARTIES 1. Mr Kouadio Kobena Fory, self-represented and declaring to act on behalf of his wife Jeanne Yavo and his three (3) children Jean-Eudes Wilfried, Akoua Merveille Laetitia and Linda De-la-Sainte Face, (hereinafter, referred to as "the Applicants" is a national of Cote d' lvoire, as are those he represents.

2. The Application is filed against the Republic of Cote D'Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State"), which became a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Charter") on 31 March 1992 and to the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and 1 Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Protocol") on 25 January 2004. On 23 July 2013, the Respondent State deposited the Declaration provided for in Article 34(6) of the Protocol by virtue of which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive applications from individuals and Non-Governmental Organisations having observer status with the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights. On 29 April 2020, the Respondent State deposited with the African Union Commission an instrument of withdrawal of its Declaration. The Court has ruled that this withdrawal has no bearing on pending cases and on new cases filed before the entry into force of the withdrawal one year after its deposit, that is, on 30 April 2021 .1 II. SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION A. Facts of the matter 3. The Applicant alleges that, in 1995, he was arrested, convicted and sentenced to ten (10) years in prison, payment of a fine and damages to the Respondent State for acts of embezzlement of public funds. One week after his release from prison in 2005, he was re-arrested and held without trial until his release in 2011.

4. Believing that his fundamental rights and those of his wife and children were violated by the Respondent State, the Applicant, acting on his own behalf and on behalf of his wife and three children, filed this Application with the Court on 8 November 2017. B. Alleged violations 5. The Applicant alleges that the Respondent State violated his rights to a fair trial , to physical and moral integrity, to freedom of opinion as well as his right to 1Suy Bi Gohore Emile and others v. Republic of C6te d'Ivoire, ACtHPR, Application No. 044/2019, Judgement of 15 July 2020 (Merits and Reparations), § 67; lngabire Victoire Umuhoza v. Republic of Rwanda, (Jurisdiction) (3 June 2016) 1 AfCLR 540 § 69. 2 property. He further alleges that his right as well as that of his wife to work and to adequate remuneration were violated and that the double detention violated his right to protection of the right to a family for his wife and children. Ill. SUMMARY OF THE PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT 6. The initial Application was received by the Registry on 8 November 2017. On 8 May 2018, the Applicant, at his own initiative, filed additional submissions to his Application.

7. On 2 July 2018, the Application and the additional submissions were served on the Respondent State.

8. On 12 October 2021, pleadings were closed and the parties were duly informed. IV. CHANGE OF TITLE OF APPLICATION 9. The Respondent State avers that while the standing of Kouadio Kobena Fory, the alleged direct victim of human rights violations, does not pose a problem, the same is not true for his wife Jeanne Yavo, son Jean-Eudes Wilfried and daughters Akoua Merveille Laetitia and Linda De-la-Sainte Face who obviously do not have standing as Applicants. It contends that the family members on whose behalf the Applicant claims to be acting are all of legal age and have the ability to bring a case directly before the Court. *** 10. The Court recalls its previous jurisprudence that "neither the Charter, nor the Protocol, nor the Rules require that the Applicant and the victim have to be the 3 same,"2 and that any person who can sue can do so on his or her own behalf and/or on behalf of others if they obtain the consent or authorization of the persons on behalf of whom they are acting.

11. In this case, the Court notes that the Applicant submits that the alleged violations of the rights of his wife and his children are closely related to his legal predicament since his double arrest and his detention. It can be inferred that the Applicant's wife and children are indirect or vicarious victims and are therefore not considered as Applicants in this case.

12. In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that Mr Kouadio Kobena Fory is the only Applicant in the instant case and declares the objection of the Respondent State to be founded.

13. The Court, having thus concluded, considers it necessary to amend the title of Application No. 034/2017: Kouadio Kobena Fory, spouse, son and daughters v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire and retain the identity of the sole Applicant Kouadio Kobena Fory. V. OPERATIVE PART 14. For these reasons, THE COURT, Unanimously, i. Finds that Kouadio Kobena Fory is the sole Applicant in the instant case; ii. Orders that the title of the Application "N°034/2017: Kouadio Kobena Fory, spouse, son and daughters v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire» shall be amended to read as follows: « N°034/2017: Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire» ; 2 Sebastien Germain Ajavon v. Republic of Benin, ACtHPR, Application No. 062/2019, Judgment (Merits) (4 December 2020), § 58. 4 Signed: lmani D. ABOUD, President; and Robert ENO, Registrar. Done in Dar Es-Salam, this Twenty-Fifth Day of November in the year Two Thousand and Twenty-One, in English and French, the French text being authoritative. 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Suy Bi Gohore Emile and others v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire, ACtHPR, Application No. 044/2019, Judgement of 15 July 2020 (Merits and Reparations), § 67

Case cited

Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v. Republic of Rwanda, (Jurisdiction) (3 June 2016) 1 AfCLR 540 § 69

Case cited

Sebastien Germain Ajavon v. Republic of Benin, ACtHPR, Application No. 062/2019, Judgment (Merits) (4 December 2020), § 58

Case cited

African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.