kulwa kulya vs isaack mlela 2020 tzhc 708 24 april 2020
The applicant failed to account for the delay of 63 days between obtaining the ruling and filing the application, and did not plead any illegality or sufficient cause in the affidavit. Therefore, the requirements for extension of time were not met.
- Citation
- kulwa kulya vs isaack mlela 2020 tzhc 708 24 april 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Kulwa Kulya; Respondent: Issack Mlela
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time for Revision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision, Limitation of Actions, Affidavit Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kulwa Kulya
Applicant
Issack Mlela
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time for Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to account for the delay of 63 days between obtaining the ruling and filing the application, and did not plead any illegality or sufficient cause in the affidavit. Therefore, the requirements for extension of time were not met.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment