kuri akwama vs aos seth 2012 tzhclandd 132 5 november 2012

kuri akwama vs aos seth 2012 tzhclandd 132 5 november 2012

Ochuodho Riaki had no title to the disputed land under customary law and could not mortgage or sell it; the appellant, however, lacked locus standi as he did not sue as a representative of the Kawino Clan.

Citation
kuri akwama vs aos seth 2012 tzhclandd 132 5 november 2012
Parties
Appellant: Kuri Akwama; Respondent: Aos Seth
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 November 2012
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / High Court Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal succeeds to the extent that all lower tribunal proceedings are quashed; appellant may institute fresh proceedings as representative of the Kawino Clan; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Title to Land, Customary Land Rights, Locus Standi, Mortgage of Unregistered Land
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kuri Akwama

Appellant

Aos Seth

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / High Court Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether Ochuodho Riaki had title to the disputed land to mortgage or sell it
  2. 2 Whether the procedure for redemption of mortgaged unregistered land was violated
  3. 3 Whether the appellant had locus standi to sue on behalf of the Kawino Clan

Ratio Decidendi

Ochuodho Riaki had no title to the disputed land under customary law and could not mortgage or sell it; the appellant, however, lacked locus standi as he did not sue as a representative of the Kawino Clan.

Court Disposition

Appeal succeeds to the extent that all lower tribunal proceedings are quashed; appellant may institute fresh proceedings as representative of the Kawino Clan; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Proceedings of the Rochi Ward Tribunal and District Land and Housing Tribunal quashed.
  • Appellant may file fresh proceedings as representative of the Kawino Clan.