Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHCCOMD

kuringe real estate co ltd vs african banking corporaton t ltd another 2022 tzhccomd 349 2 november 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Judgment and decree entered by consent based on the parties' settlement, obligating the 1st defendant to pay the plaintiff TZS 1,000,000,000 in two instalments, with execution proceedings in case of default.

Court disposition

Consent judgment and decree entered in favour of the plaintiff

Orders

  • 1st defendant to pay TZS 1,000,000,000 to plaintiff
  • 1st defendant to pay 61% (TZS 610,815,941.52) immediately after filing deed of settlement
  • 1st defendant to pay 39% (TZS 389,184,058.48) three months after first instalment
  • Default in payment will attract execution proceedings

02

Material facts

Parties

Kuringe Real Estate Co. Ltd

Plaintiff Counsel: Ms. Jane Joseph

African Banking Corporation Tanzania Limited

1st Defendant Counsel: Mr. Omari Msemo

Majembe Auction Mart Ltd

2nd Defendant Counsel: Mr. Omari Msemo

Amounts and remedies

  • Agreed Settlement Amount: TZS 1,000,000,000
  • First Instalment (61%): TZS 610,815,941.52
  • Second Instalment (39%): TZS 389,184,058.48

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Commercial Case / Consent Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiff sought repayment of loan, damages for losses due to defendants' negligence in auction procedures, reimbursement of legal fees, general damages, and interest.
Respondent
Defendants agreed to settle by paying the plaintiff a specified amount in two instalments as per deed of settlement.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Deed of Settlement executed by parties

    Consent judgment based on settlement agreement between parties

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Judgment and decree entered by consent based on the parties' settlement, obligating the 1st defendant to pay the plaintiff TZS 1,000,000,000 in two instalments, with execution proceedings in case of default.

Court disposition

Consent judgment and decree entered in favour of the plaintiff

  • 1st defendant to pay TZS 1,000,000,000 to plaintiff
  • 1st defendant to pay 61% (TZS 610,815,941.52) immediately after filing deed of settlement
  • 1st defendant to pay 39% (TZS 389,184,058.48) three months after first instalment
  • Default in payment will attract execution proceedings

Source and reliance status

TZHCCOMD · 2 November 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHCCOMD

Judgment· 2 November 2022

kuringe real estate co ltd vs african banking corporaton t ltd another 2022 tzhccomd 349 2 november 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)

AT DAR ES SALAAM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 127 OF 2021

BETWEEN KURINGE REAL ESTATE CO. LTD............................ PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

AFRICAN BANKING CORPORATION TANZANIA LIMITED............................................ lst DEFENDANT MAJEMBE AUCTION MART LTD........................... 2nd DEFENDANT Date of last order: 2nd November, 2022 Date of Judgment: 2nd November, 2022

CONSENT JUDGMENT MKEHA, J. The plaintiff was praying for judgement and decree against the defendants jointly as follows: .

1. Repaying the loan which the plaintiff had taken from Bank of Africa and of which the plaintiff was subjected to repay out of the house the plaintiff had purchased for commercial purposes but never utilized the same for the intended business thus invited interest of 11 P a g e 28% per annum equal to TZS 126,000,000 per annum for a period of five years and six months equal to TZS 705,600,000; 2. Disturbances and losses suffered by the plaintiff due to the defendants' negligence and failure to adhere to the auctioning legal procedures attracting damages of TZS 280,000,000; 3. Instruction fees paid to lawyers to represent the plaintiff in court in conducting Land Case No. 10 of 2016 and transfer of right of occupancy fee totalling to TZS 75,000,000; 4. Instruction fees paid to lawyers as part payment of instruction fees TZS 25,000,000; 5. Costs of the suit; 6. General damages to the tune of USD 150,000; 7. Interest on the decretal sum at a rate of 11% from the date of judgment to the date of final payment; 8. Any other reliefs, this Honourable Court shall deem fit and just to grant in favour of the plaintiff. Through a deed of settlement executed by the parties to this suit, the parties have agreed that, the l^ defendant shall pay 61% of the agreed amount that is, 610,815,941.52/=immediately after filing the deed of 2| Page settlement in court and that, the remaining 39% which is TZS. 389,184,058.48 will be paid three months after the first instalment. Therefore, pursuant to the said agreement of the parties, a consent judgment and decree is hereby entered in favour of the plaintiff in the following terms: 1. The lst defendant shall pay to the plaintiff TZS 1,000,000,000/=.

2. The lst defendant shall pay 61% of the agreed amount that is TZS 610,815,941.52 immediately after the filing of the parties' Deed of Settlement in court.

3. The lst defendant shall pay 39% of the agreed amount which is TZS 389, 184,058.48 to the plaintiff three months after payment of the first instalment.

4. Default in paying the two instalments will attract normal execution proceedings. Dated at DAR ES SALAAM this 2nd Day of November 2022. 3 | Page Court: Consent judgement and decree pronounced in the presence of Mr. Omari Msemo Learned advocate for the defendants and Ms. Jane Joseph legal Officer of the Plaintiff. 02/11/2022 4| Page

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.