Criminal Application No

Criminal Application No

The applicant failed to show good cause for the delay and did not establish that the intended review would be based on any of the grounds specified in Rule 66(1) of the Rules. The application was based on a misapprehension of an automatic right to review, which does not exist.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
Criminal Application No
Parties
Applicant: Laureno M Seya; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Discretionary Powers, Good Cause Requirement
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Discretionary Powers Good Cause Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laureno M Seya

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to apply for review under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to show good cause for the delay and did not establish that the intended review would be based on any of the grounds specified in Rule 66(1) of the Rules. The application was based on a misapprehension of an automatic right to review, which does not exist.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to apply for review is dismissed.