20050414 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The respondent was the lawful owner of the plot as his right of occupancy was not lawfully revoked before the purported grant to the 2nd appellant. The appellants' entry onto the land constituted trespass. Special damages were not fully proved, so the award was reduced by half.
- Citation
- 20050414 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Lawrence Cheyo; Appellant: Nundwile Cheyo; Respondent: Simon Peter Mroso
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with variation to special damages and costs awarded to the respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Double Allocation of Land, Trespass, Special Damages, Land Ownership, Revocation of Land Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Cheyo
Appellant
Nundwile Cheyo
Appellant
Simon Peter Mroso
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was the lawful owner of Plot No. 926 Block H, Mbezi Beach
- 2 Whether the appellants trespassed on the respondent's land
- 3 Whether special damages were properly awarded
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent was the lawful owner of the plot as his right of occupancy was not lawfully revoked before the purported grant to the 2nd appellant. The appellants' entry onto the land constituted trespass. Special damages were not fully proved, so the award was reduced by half.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with variation to special damages and costs awarded to the respondent.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Special damages reduced to TZS 250,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment