N
The sentence and compensation imposed by the trial court were not so harsh as to warrant interference, and there was no illegality, irrationality, or perverseness in the exercise of sentencing discretion.
- Citation
- N
- Parties
- Appellant: Lear d/o Hango; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Compensation, Confirmation of Sentence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Lear d/o Hango
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence and compensation imposed were excessively harsh to warrant interference by the appellate court
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate's order requiring confirmation of sentence by the High Court was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence and compensation imposed by the trial court were not so harsh as to warrant interference, and there was no illegality, irrationality, or perverseness in the exercise of sentencing discretion.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment