20041126 TZCA Zanzibar

20041126 TZCA Zanzibar

The appeal is incompetent because no extension of time was granted for applying for leave to appeal and no leave to appeal was given; procedural requirements for instituting the appeal were not met.

Citation
20041126 TZCA Zanzibar
Parties
Appellants: Biyam A. Mwale (Biyam Said Nassor), Faith Bilal, Amina Makame Muombwa, Mgomvi Masorwa, Sakina-Allkire9u, Salma Miraji Khamis (Saima Jurna Rehaii), Mariammiibwa Khamis, Rukia U. Bl14usa (Rukia Omar Othman), Shinuna Bushiri Hemed (Shinuna Ali Hemed), Khadija M. Masrouk, Liaa Othman, Nyomo M. Kombi; Respondents: Bank of Tanzania Zanzibar Branch, OTTU Branch (Bank of Tanzania Zanzibar Branch)
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 November 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
appeal struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Competency of Appeal, Procedural Requirements
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Employment Law Leave to Appeal Extension of Time Competency of Appeal Procedural Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Biyam A. Mwale (Biyam Said Nassor), Faith Bilal, Amina Makame Muombwa, Mgomvi Masorwa, Sakina-Allkire9u, Salma Miraji Khamis (Saima Jurna Rehaii), Mariammiibwa Khamis, Rukia U. Bl14usa (Rukia Omar Othman), Shinuna Bushiri Hemed (Shinuna Ali Hemed), Khadija M. Masrouk, Liaa Othman, Nyomo M. Kombi

Appellants

Bank of Tanzania Zanzibar Branch, OTTU Branch (Bank of Tanzania Zanzibar Branch)

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is competent where leave to appeal was not properly sought or granted
  2. 2 Whether extension of time to apply for leave to appeal was properly granted

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is incompetent because no extension of time was granted for applying for leave to appeal and no leave to appeal was given; procedural requirements for instituting the appeal were not met.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The appeal is declared incompetent and struck out with costs.