lekam investment co ltd vs the registered trustees of al juma mosque and others 2020 tzhc 3346 30 october 2020

lekam investment co ltd vs the registered trustees of al juma mosque and others 2020 tzhc 3346 30 october 2020

The applicant was duly served through substituted service as required by law, and failed to demonstrate any sufficient cause for non-appearance; the court cannot revisit or overrule its own order for substituted service.

Citation
lekam investment co ltd vs the registered trustees of al juma mosque and others 2020 tzhc 3346 30 october 2020
Parties
Applicant: LEKAM Investment Co. Ltd; 1st Respondent: The Registered Trustees of Al-Juma Mosque; 2nd Respondent: The Administrator General; 3rd Respondent: Clement Kahabuka; 4th Respondent: Abdallah Ilamulira; 5th Respondent: Mamba Auction Mart and Court Broker
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
30 October 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Revision / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Substituted Service, Jurisdiction, Proof of Service
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment Substituted Service Jurisdiction Proof of Service

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LEKAM Investment Co. Ltd

Applicant

The Registered Trustees of Al-Juma Mosque

1st Respondent

The Administrator General

2nd Respondent

Clement Kahabuka

3rd Respondent

Abdallah Ilamulira

4th Respondent

Mamba Auction Mart and Court Broker

5th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Revision / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was duly served with summons through substituted service
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from entering appearance
  3. 3 Whether the order for substituted service was properly granted

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was duly served through substituted service as required by law, and failed to demonstrate any sufficient cause for non-appearance; the court cannot revisit or overrule its own order for substituted service.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application to set aside ex parte judgment is dismissed
  • Applicant to pay costs